git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
To: Magnus Holmgren <magnus.holmgren@milientsoftware.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Santi Béjar" <santi@agolina.net>,
	"Junio C Hamano" <gitster@pobox.com>,
	"Sergey Organov" <sorganov@gmail.com>,
	"Christian Couder" <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
	"Jeff King" <peff@peff.net>, "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Subject: Re: Please explain avoiding history simplifications when diffing merges
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 16:58:14 +0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZQbNtgd82iARQ39D@debian.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2250343.okVFLFBGsW@utklippan>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1616 bytes --]

On Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 05:10:28PM +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:
> Friday, 8 September 2023 11:09:20 CEST, I wrote
> > QGit was bitten by
> > https://github.com/git/git/commit/0dec322d31db3920872f43bdd2a7ddd282a5be67
> 
> Maybe I should link to the QGit issue:
> https://github.com/tibirna/qgit/issues/129
> 
> > It looks like passing --simplify-merges to override the default solves the
> > problem, but I still want to ask here because I'm not sure I fully
> > understand
> > the reasoning:
> > > the default history simplification would remove merge commits from
> > > consideration if the file "path" matched the second parent.
> 
> As I wrote at the above URL, I realized that the old git log output without --
> simplify-merges and the output with --simplify-merges aren't quite the same. 
> The old output indeed omits some interesting merge commits, which may explain 
> why the change was made, but git log --simplify-merges does include them, so 
> it seems a reasonable default to me.

Can you provide examples?

> 
> However, QGit has a problem: git log --diff-merges=separate includes a 
> separate diff for each parent, but only for each parent with differences 
> compared to the merge commit, *and* there's no custom format placeholder for 
> the current parent, only for the list of parents (%P/%p). How should one go 
> about adding that? I figure the format_commit_context struct in pretty.c needs 
> another field.

What are you trying to accomplish with your proposed formatting verbs?

Confused...

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-17  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-08  9:09 Please explain avoiding history simplifications when diffing merges Magnus Holmgren
2023-09-15 15:10 ` Magnus Holmgren
2023-09-17  9:58   ` Bagas Sanjaya [this message]
2023-09-25 16:11     ` Magnus Holmgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZQbNtgd82iARQ39D@debian.me \
    --to=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=l.s.r@web.de \
    --cc=magnus.holmgren@milientsoftware.com \
    --cc=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=santi@agolina.net \
    --cc=sorganov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).