From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] t6700: mark test as leak-free
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2023 13:40:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZR71EdeO1Ige1+Xe@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231003202609.GA7812@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Tue, Oct 03, 2023 at 04:26:09PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> This test has never leaked since it was added. Let's annotate it to make
> sure it stays that way (and to reduce noise when looking for other
> leak-free scripts after we fix some leaks).
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
> ---
> Obviously not directly related to the rest; this could be spun off to
> its own series, or put atop jk/tree-name-and-depth-limit and merged from
> there.
I wondered how I missed this in tb/mark-more-tests-as-leak-free, but the
answer is trivial: that topic preceded your tree depth stuff ;-).
This change makes good sense, and I don't think it's worth spinning off
into its own series.
Thanks,
Taylor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-05 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-03 20:25 [PATCH 0/10] some commit-graph leak fixes Jeff King
2023-10-03 20:26 ` [PATCH 01/10] t6700: mark test as leak-free Jeff King
2023-10-05 17:40 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2023-10-03 20:26 ` [PATCH 02/10] commit-reach: free temporary list in get_octopus_merge_bases() Jeff King
2023-10-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 03/10] merge: free result of repo_get_merge_bases() Jeff King
2023-10-05 17:42 ` Taylor Blau
2023-10-03 20:27 ` [PATCH 04/10] commit-graph: move slab-clearing to close_commit_graph() Jeff King
2023-10-05 17:42 ` Taylor Blau
2023-10-03 20:29 ` [PATCH 05/10] commit-graph: free all elements of graph chain Jeff King
2023-10-03 20:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] commit-graph: delay base_graph assignment in add_graph_to_chain() Jeff King
2023-10-05 17:44 ` Taylor Blau
2023-10-03 20:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] commit-graph: free graph struct that was not added to chain Jeff King
2023-10-03 20:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] commit-graph: free write-context entries before overwriting Jeff King
2023-10-05 17:51 ` Taylor Blau
2023-10-05 21:03 ` Jeff King
2023-10-03 20:31 ` [PATCH 09/10] commit-graph: free write-context base_graph_name during cleanup Jeff King
2023-10-03 20:31 ` [PATCH 10/10] commit-graph: clear oidset after finishing write Jeff King
2023-10-04 1:33 ` Is SANITIZE=leak make test unreliable for anyone else? Eric W. Biederman
2023-10-04 13:21 ` Jeff King
2023-10-04 14:19 ` Eric W. Biederman
2023-10-04 14:47 ` Jeff King
2023-10-04 15:38 ` Eric W. Biederman
2023-10-05 17:52 ` [PATCH 0/10] some commit-graph leak fixes Taylor Blau
2023-10-06 0:39 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZR71EdeO1Ige1+Xe@nand.local \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).