From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Robert Coup via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Robert Coup <robert@coup.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] upload-pack: add tracing for fetches
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2023 17:32:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZScUWrj6CQTg05HL@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pull.1598.git.1697040242703.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 04:04:02PM +0000, Robert Coup via GitGitGadget wrote:
> From: Robert Coup <robert@coup.net.nz>
>
> Information on how users are accessing hosted repositories can be
> helpful to server operators. For example, being able to broadly
> differentiate between fetches and initial clones; the use of shallow
> repository features; or partial clone filters.
Indeed. One of the custom patches that GitHub is carrying in its private
fork is something similar to this that dumps information from
upload-pack into a custom logging system specific to GitHub (called
"sockstat", in case anybody was curious).
I suspect that we would still live with that patch because we depend on
some of the custom logging infrastructure provided by sockstat, but this
is definitely a good direction to be pursuing for git.git nonetheless.
> @@ -1552,6 +1553,32 @@ static int parse_have(const char *line, struct oid_array *haves)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void trace2_fetch_info(struct upload_pack_data *data)
> +{
> + struct json_writer jw = JSON_WRITER_INIT;
> +
> + jw_object_begin(&jw, 0);
> + {
Is there a reason that we have a separate scope here? I think we may
want to drop this as unnecessary, but it's entirely possible that I'm
missing something here...
> + jw_object_intmax(&jw, "haves", data->haves.nr);
> + jw_object_intmax(&jw, "wants", data->want_obj.nr);
> + jw_object_intmax(&jw, "want-refs", data->wanted_refs.nr);
> + jw_object_intmax(&jw, "depth", data->depth);
> + jw_object_intmax(&jw, "shallows", data->shallows.nr);
> + jw_object_bool(&jw, "deepen-since", data->deepen_since);
> + jw_object_intmax(&jw, "deepen-not", data->deepen_not.nr);
> + jw_object_bool(&jw, "deepen-relative", data->deepen_relative);
> + if (data->filter_options.choice)
> + jw_object_string(&jw, "filter", list_object_filter_config_name(data->filter_options.choice));
I'm pretty sure that list_object_filter_config_name() returns characters
that are safe for JSON-encoding, and/or that jw_object_string() does any
quoting beforehand, but worth checking nonetheless.
> + else
> + jw_object_null(&jw, "filter");
These all seem like useful things to have.
Thanks,
Taylor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-11 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-11 16:04 [PATCH] upload-pack: add tracing for fetches Robert Coup via GitGitGadget
2023-10-11 21:26 ` Taylor Blau
2023-10-11 21:32 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2023-10-11 22:33 ` Robert Coup
2023-10-11 22:27 ` Jeff King
2023-10-11 22:36 ` Robert Coup
2023-10-17 21:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Robert Coup via GitGitGadget
2023-10-23 18:28 ` Robert Coup
2023-10-23 18:55 ` Jeff King
2023-10-30 20:25 ` Taylor Blau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZScUWrj6CQTg05HL@nand.local \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=robert@coup.net.nz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).