From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] commit: detect commits that exist in commit-graph but not in the ODB
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:25:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZTDn-Wd5xsFrBmqI@tanuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZTDQjangLsQ1cSJl@tanuki>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2654 bytes --]
On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 08:45:34AM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:34:53AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> >
> > > Fair point indeed. The following is a worst-case scenario benchmark of
> > > of the change where we do a full topological walk of all reachable
> > > commits in the graph, executed in linux.git. We parse commit parents via
> > > `repo_parse_commit_gently()`, so the new code path now basically has to
> > > check for object existence of every reachable commit:
> > > ...
> > > The added check does lead to a performance regression indeed, which is
> > > not all that unexpected. That being said, the commit-graph still results
> > > in a significant speedup compared to the case where we don't have it.
> >
> > Yeah, I agree that both points are expected. An extra check that is
> > much cheaper than the full parsing is paying a small price to be a
> > bit more careful than before. The question is if the price is small
> > enough. I am still not sure if the extra carefulness is warranted
> > for all normal cases to spend 30% extra cycles.
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> Well, seen in contexts like the thread that spawned this discussion I
> think it's preferable to take a relatively smaller price compared to
> disabling the commit graph entirely in some situations. With that in
> mind, personally I'd be happy with either of two outcomes here:
>
> - We take the patch I proposed as a hardening measure, which allows
> us to use the commit graph in basically any situation where we
> could parse objects from the ODB without any downside except for a
> performance hit.
>
> - We say that corrupt repositories do not need to be accounted for
> when using metadata caches like the commit-graph. That would mean
> in consequence that for the `--missing` flag we would not have to
> disable commit graphs.
>
> The test failure that was exposed in Karthik's test only stems from the
> fact that we manually corrupt the repository and is not specific to the
> `--missing` flag. This is further stressed by the new test aded in my
> own patch, as we can trigger a similar bug when not using `--missing`.
There's another way to handle this, which is to conditionally enable the
object existence check. This would be less of a performance hit compared
to disabling commit graphs altogether with `--missing`, but still ensure
that repository corruption was detected. Second, it would not regress
performance for all preexisting users of `repo_parse_commit_gently()`.
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-19 8:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-09 10:55 [PATCH 0/3] rev-list: add support for commits in `--missing` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-09 10:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] revision: rename bit to `do_not_die_on_missing_objects` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-09 10:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] rev-list: move `show_commit()` to the bottom Karthik Nayak
2023-10-09 10:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] rev-list: add commit object support in `--missing` option Karthik Nayak
2023-10-09 22:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] rev-list: add support for commits in `--missing` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-10 6:19 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2023-10-10 17:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-11 10:37 ` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-11 16:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-12 10:44 ` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-12 11:04 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2023-10-12 13:23 ` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-12 16:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-13 5:53 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2023-10-13 8:38 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2023-10-13 12:37 ` [PATCH] commit: detect commits that exist in commit-graph but not in the ODB Patrick Steinhardt
2023-10-13 18:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-17 6:37 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2023-10-17 18:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-19 6:45 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2023-10-19 8:25 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2023-10-19 17:16 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-20 10:00 ` Jeff King
2023-10-20 17:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-23 10:15 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2023-10-13 17:07 ` [PATCH 0/3] rev-list: add support for commits in `--missing` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-12 16:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-16 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 " Karthik Nayak
2023-10-16 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] revision: rename bit to `do_not_die_on_missing_objects` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-16 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] rev-list: move `show_commit()` to the bottom Karthik Nayak
2023-10-16 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] rev-list: add commit object support in `--missing` option Karthik Nayak
2023-10-16 16:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] rev-list: add support for commits in `--missing` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-16 19:01 ` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-16 20:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-19 12:10 ` [PATCH v3 " Karthik Nayak
2023-10-19 12:10 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] revision: rename bit to `do_not_die_on_missing_objects` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-19 12:10 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] rev-list: move `show_commit()` to the bottom Karthik Nayak
2023-10-19 12:10 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] rev-list: add commit object support in `--missing` option Karthik Nayak
2023-10-19 22:05 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-19 23:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-20 11:14 ` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-20 14:47 ` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-20 17:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-20 16:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-24 11:34 ` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-24 12:26 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] rev-list: add support for commits in `--missing` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-24 12:26 ` [PATCH v4 1/3] revision: rename bit to `do_not_die_on_missing_objects` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-24 12:26 ` [PATCH v4 2/3] rev-list: move `show_commit()` to the bottom Karthik Nayak
2023-10-24 12:26 ` [PATCH v4 3/3] rev-list: add commit object support in `--missing` option Karthik Nayak
2023-10-24 17:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-25 0:35 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-25 9:34 ` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-25 6:40 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2023-10-26 12:37 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-10-26 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 0/3] rev-list: add support for commits in `--missing` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-26 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] revision: rename bit to `do_not_die_on_missing_objects` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-26 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] rev-list: move `show_commit()` to the bottom Karthik Nayak
2023-10-26 10:11 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] rev-list: add commit object support in `--missing` option Karthik Nayak
2023-10-27 6:25 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2023-10-27 7:54 ` Karthik Nayak
2023-10-27 7:59 ` Karthik Nayak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZTDn-Wd5xsFrBmqI@tanuki \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).