From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, christian.couder@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ref-filter: support filtering of operational refs
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 18:36:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZZWbMekL2URby0qV@tanuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqil4a9vue.fsf@gitster.g>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1021 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 09:21:13AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
>
> > ... But the problem is that tools like git-update-ref(1) don't
> > enforce this, so something like `git update-ref foo/bar HEAD` happily
> > creates "$GIT_DIR/foo/bar". And I bet there are other ways to write refs
> > at arbitrary paths.
>
> I think we should tighten things up over time. First by teaching
> the ref backend that anything that is not a pseudoref, HEAD or a
> proper ref (one item of whose definition is "lives under refs/
> hierarchy) should not resolve_ref() successfully. That should
> correctly fail things like
>
> $ git rev-parse worktrees/$name/bisect/bad
> $ git update-ref foo/bar HEAD
>
> I'd hope.
>
> Thanks.
Yeah, agreed, that's something we should do. I do wonder whether this
will break existing usecases, but in any case I'd rather consider it an
accident that it is possible to write (and read) such refs in the first
place.
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-03 17:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-21 17:07 [RFC 0/2] Initial changes to support printing all refs Karthik Nayak
2023-12-21 17:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] refs: introduce the `refs_single_ref` function Karthik Nayak
2023-12-21 17:07 ` [PATCH 2/2] ref-filter: support filtering of operational refs Karthik Nayak
2023-12-21 20:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2023-12-22 14:05 ` Karthik Nayak
2023-12-26 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-02 15:18 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-01-02 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-02 18:47 ` Taylor Blau
2024-01-03 8:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-03 10:22 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-01-03 14:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-03 15:50 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-03 16:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-03 16:17 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-03 17:21 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-03 17:36 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-01-03 17:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-03 18:01 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-04 11:31 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-01-04 23:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-03 15:45 ` Taylor Blau
2024-01-03 15:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-03 17:00 ` Taylor Blau
2023-12-28 10:34 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-02 15:23 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-01-02 18:49 ` Taylor Blau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZZWbMekL2URby0qV@tanuki \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).