From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28CF8BA27 for ; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.123.24 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705476952; cv=none; b=Bd+dLuDicUpSLxcczKuWWFptf+1qRn07naXil7lqNRmXFog7LqYKU+vSLqbQT9cb/HHma3Nd+qFG5LGPe/TexfeRwGcKbE5E/qmP4rgWmT2z0VkzEQdttFczf3O4SvL/5f4i4FaBVWUcQ/aQyK6iVRQY4Ew32j5KC+XtTUEXdCI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1705476952; c=relaxed/simple; bh=zJByQ+4B9lLP9m4lY77j7B8P2NsK8XN+aOHZletqv28=; h=Received:Received:DKIM-Signature:DKIM-Signature:X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received:X-ME-Proxy-Cause:X-ME-Proxy:Feedback-ID:Received: Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ewVi1uKGF4s1jOvbdBpu1NwpCVlLpUifIldlQPsO+VJfJl6c69hcHOnq9L1BZ7MKnh1HGP3d3Lkq+qECNsJ3DiZW2Ssh4SObLNn0jHjoBqKV8m/XqTUB441TDWLQqk6Q4EbrOgAwun221jtX2I92/AO2aux/h6WpMx8I87i9mSY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pks.im; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b=XNyD40v2; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=bW6VXTeM; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.123.24 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b="XNyD40v2"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="bW6VXTeM" Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.internal [10.202.2.45]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342A23200AC1; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 02:35:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 17 Jan 2024 02:35:50 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pks.im; h=cc:cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1705476949; x=1705563349; bh=EcKsGydQDA hAtxZVIyyxriqCEFEuULjJUBy+Z2Jtt/g=; b=XNyD40v2LZLxONH4aBhJMd+ttI FIJlfefUsk76KkG2V/Y6ZhydTOouU9UXY3bCw4dsEiDaoU1kBktbyVwraFUiKE7o xgxUCs2g22Ty7HyRIzFdZ7lZL6mt3OuOE/tk5p3gPZB4oVWhw+4Q7qDXaAkl1W5W 51hTge8ocBxcvwPJj6RvCdRV/aZ4NWBfDYs6PfaPwAo7fxbUSXZ2iGHsGfyXyJKn takrqliPvgtESw9XMgrmn9JS0uWetcNvhYvlw+q82JITuI4zuCb+Xe4g/7vSXV/V nRuBNer4ntk9KHM4EqGbNMzeBhfPhmNs3X4tKpuebkx9Hq/STctbjUBblv/Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1705476949; x=1705563349; bh=EcKsGydQDAhAtxZVIyyxriqCEFEu ULjJUBy+Z2Jtt/g=; b=bW6VXTeMk4XFBvPeNxnbCNT2dRy++ahz/gi6cm2Pj0Dg g4AD2S74n3+nQ6PiEpwAh8U6lmp4O71zz0WaRZCkTVo29wve/G398ks7wyGJyyMY kSkQM1tvCNcZ5fC3qz27+3uOVzoFEyMuNprLUKBHYAMMKVdWy4nTFXfVJRSfYZ+r Ab/4Lnl1kwbLbYnofwNT3143RQh2r2pv9lmp0ZEnJewYZlDfMV9UY7Zn+D8Rnh5S MZ5ZZgd1bKvnDZyfXxsQGbcJ1HWVFeBqDcLtFC/klXy8UL0py35ub91WMilFAcGq NPYgD/9Myz0dDt2L9xSlLfDQtyCG1bb/jQraVE4wIQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvkedrvdejgedguddutdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesgh dtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgrthhrihgtkhcuufhtvghinhhhrghrughtuceophhs sehpkhhsrdhimheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepueektdevtdffveeljeetgfehheeige ekleduvdeffeeghefgledttdehjeelffetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhssehpkhhsrdhimh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i197146af:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 17 Jan 2024 02:35:45 -0500 (EST) Received: by vm-mail (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id dbbcf148 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Wed, 17 Jan 2024 07:31:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2024 08:34:28 +0100 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ci: add macOS jobs to GitLab CI Message-ID: References: <61115e68-3d63-4e08-85f7-ae6650f3724e@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2Dgv9f43aYwbqMwk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <61115e68-3d63-4e08-85f7-ae6650f3724e@gmail.com> --2Dgv9f43aYwbqMwk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 02:58:53PM +0000, Phillip Wood wrote: > Hi Patrick >=20 > On 15/01/2024 11:45, Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > Add two macOS-based jobs to GitLab CI, one for Clang and one for GCC. >=20 > This doesn't match whats in the rest of the commit message where you expl= ain > why there is no gcc job. The patch itself looks good to me and it is nice > that we'll now be testing on arm64 with the GitLab runners. Oops. In my first iterations I still had an osx-gcc job, but I could not get it passing due to the architectural difficulties explained in the message, so I ended up removing it. This sentence is thus a leftover =66rom previous iterations. > > This matches equivalent jobs we have for GitHub Workflows, except that > > we use macOS 14 instead of macOS 13. > >=20 > > Note that one test marked as `test_must_fail` is surprisingly passing: > >=20 > > t7815-grep-binary.sh (Wstat: 0 Tests: 22= Failed: 0) > > TODO passed: 12 > >=20 > > This seems to boil down to an unexpected difference in how regcomp(1) >=20 > nit: regcomp(3)? Indeed, thanks! Patrick --2Dgv9f43aYwbqMwk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEF9hrgiFbCdvenl/rVbJhu7ckPpQFAmWngwMACgkQVbJhu7ck PpQHWA//QMXvyHPUv6YNZ5BDZ+PsQ3T3pIt6sov+eqC3bzpRoEgrT/JuUJxx8Cda k52zLVg4ta2W/s1cH7f9FROJzqum0YvbhAJrV4e+wI64w4Nt9siVx0+8qtba6jP1 bLkBXjAtAPJInwc1Obwiev9zxqrg3HI/qqUYRoQyaMzu7ESWUhWzc2sk0TlrmBhA GlAo4DQx6YThdCa0KN1N6hxGA09vBOKKP2mq30QHOj7l4k5y+Pij1QWVZaqMMmhK kYOBz5KMF3rQoyV91VRPSSxX55HVx/9s9Wjf7V8XGGn9oUn3FfN25msMM+K36Z3r AKbwzYCGTeufkJeTtuwC8gE9jO5QkeDpl1psm2EAtiwLb4uMgkuKqdHY5264ayZy ebDblW3+71oP2U94tA35vDj38qAWQNWy8/fkt2oblMQsxEyqBda6rTo+xC/jhBq+ Ui1jhBZ+nm84TwcriiAg/4AwYsZUG8YR7LgERvLZOd9FDJSgcVzvvDh0Orii8vhb 0EIL63i4ubxZ+c/nlTGrTO79mRo8qvg07GDrB8x8otfaBUPs2K0dbFiPcK1pMJin ATEWYHXCRWzIFzTLNz6Jap7hs+YRvV4FtpCGdy/5moz00jWCKkYSFJCcMwG0z/mb Pp9HT1uSLZHLuUVuI7WlHwX38elCIHxegmIznFu8XOk/YSUDNGM= =juka -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2Dgv9f43aYwbqMwk--