git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
	Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] reftable: introduce macros to allocate arrays
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 07:10:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcHNPXf9ka_KhJxD@tanuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOLa=ZSDz4PMqFGp3MHr7Ls2xOUs+NEnG-y09J9knNd_eGpZUQ@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 955 bytes --]

On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 07:48:41AM -0800, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> 
> > Similar to the preceding commit, let's carry over macros to allocate
> > arrays with `REFTABLE_ALLOC_ARRAY()` and `REFTABLE_CALLOC_ARRAY()`. This
> > requires us to change the signature of `reftable_calloc()`, which only
> > takes a single argument right now and thus puts the burden on the caller
> > to calculate the final array's size. This is a net improvement though as
> > it means that we can now provide proper overflow checks when multiplying
> > the array size with the member size.
> >
> > Convert callsites of `reftable_calloc()` to the new signature, using the
> > new macros where possible.
> 
> What about converting users of `reftable_malloc()` to use
> `REFTABLE_ALLOC_ARRAY()`. This means currently `REFTABLE_ALLOC_ARRAY()`
> is defined and never used in this patch series.

Good point, will do.

Patrick

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-02-06  6:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-01-31  8:00 [PATCH 0/9] reftable: code style improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31  8:01 ` [PATCH 1/9] reftable: introduce macros to grow arrays Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 17:44   ` Eric Sunshine
2024-01-31 20:35   ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-01  7:29     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 16:30       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-01-31  8:01 ` [PATCH 2/9] reftable: introduce macros to allocate arrays Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31  8:01 ` [PATCH 3/9] reftable/stack: fix parameter validation when compacting range Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31  8:01 ` [PATCH 4/9] reftable/stack: index segments with `size_t` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31  8:01 ` [PATCH 5/9] reftable/stack: use `size_t` to track stack slices during compaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31  8:01 ` [PATCH 6/9] reftable/stack: use `size_t` to track stack length Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31  8:01 ` [PATCH 7/9] reftable/merged: refactor seeking of records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31 17:55   ` Eric Sunshine
2024-01-31  8:01 ` [PATCH 8/9] reftable/merged: refactor initialization of iterators Patrick Steinhardt
2024-01-31  8:01 ` [PATCH 9/9] reftable/record: improve semantics when initializing records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01  7:32 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] reftable: code style improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01  7:32   ` [PATCH v2 1/9] reftable: introduce macros to grow arrays Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01  7:32   ` [PATCH v2 2/9] reftable: introduce macros to allocate arrays Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-05 15:48     ` Karthik Nayak
2024-02-06  6:10       ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-02-01  7:33   ` [PATCH v2 3/9] reftable/stack: fix parameter validation when compacting range Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01 16:15     ` Toon Claes
2024-02-02  5:21       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01  7:33   ` [PATCH v2 4/9] reftable/stack: index segments with `size_t` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01  7:33   ` [PATCH v2 5/9] reftable/stack: use `size_t` to track stack slices during compaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01  7:33   ` [PATCH v2 6/9] reftable/stack: use `size_t` to track stack length Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01  7:33   ` [PATCH v2 7/9] reftable/merged: refactor seeking of records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01  7:33   ` [PATCH v2 8/9] reftable/merged: refactor initialization of iterators Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-01  7:33   ` [PATCH v2 9/9] reftable/record: improve semantics when initializing records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06  6:35 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] reftable: code style improvements Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06  6:35   ` [PATCH v3 1/9] reftable: introduce macros to grow arrays Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06  6:35   ` [PATCH v3 2/9] reftable: introduce macros to allocate arrays Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06  6:35   ` [PATCH v3 3/9] reftable/stack: fix parameter validation when compacting range Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06  6:35   ` [PATCH v3 4/9] reftable/stack: index segments with `size_t` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06  6:35   ` [PATCH v3 5/9] reftable/stack: use `size_t` to track stack slices during compaction Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06  6:35   ` [PATCH v3 6/9] reftable/stack: use `size_t` to track stack length Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06  6:35   ` [PATCH v3 7/9] reftable/merged: refactor seeking of records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06  6:35   ` [PATCH v3 8/9] reftable/merged: refactor initialization of iterators Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06  6:35   ` [PATCH v3 9/9] reftable/record: improve semantics when initializing records Patrick Steinhardt
2024-02-06  9:10   ` [PATCH v3 0/9] reftable: code style improvements Karthik Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZcHNPXf9ka_KhJxD@tanuki \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
    --cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).