Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] merge-tree: handle missing objects correctly

Junio C Hamano
2024-02-23T18:23:25Z

"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
writes:

> I recently looked into issues where git merge-tree calls returned bogus data
> (in one instance returning an empty tree for non-empty merge parents). By
> the time I had a look at the corresponding repository, the issue was no
> longer reproducible, but a closer look at the code combined with some manual
> experimenting turned up the fact that missing tree objects aren't handled as
> errors by git merge-tree.

Looking good. Will replace. Thanks.