From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] show-ref --verify: accept pseudorefs
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 09:24:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZcSPpbL6AWAOkkCI@tanuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq5xz0b3lu.fsf@gitster.g>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1163 bytes --]
On Wed, Feb 07, 2024 at 09:12:29AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> "Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > ... when CHERRY_PICK_HEAD exists. By calling refname_is_safe() instead
> > of comparing the refname to "HEAD" we can accept all one-level refs that
> > contain only uppercase ascii letters and underscores.
>
> Geez. We have at least three implementations to determine if a ref
> is a valid name?
`check_refname_format()` and `refname_is_safe()` are often used in
tandem. `check_refname_format()` performs the first set of checks to
verify whether the pathname components are valid, whereas
`refname_is_safe()` checks for refs which are unsafe e.g. because they
try to escape out of "refs/".
I think that we really ought to merge `refname_is_safe()` into
`check_refname_format()`. It would require us to introduce a new flag
`REFNAME_ALLOW_BAD_NAME` to the latter function so that it would accept
refs with a bad name that are otherwise safe. But I think we shouldn't
ever allow unsafe names, so merging these two functions would overall
reduce the potential for security-relevant issues.
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-08 8:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-07 16:44 [PATCH 0/2] show-ref --verify: accept psuedorefs Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] show-ref --verify: accept pseudorefs Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
2024-02-07 17:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-08 8:24 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-02-08 14:34 ` phillip.wood123
2024-02-07 16:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] t1400: use show-ref to check pseudorefs Phillip Wood via GitGitGadget
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZcSPpbL6AWAOkkCI@tanuki \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox