From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: "Randall S. Becker" <the.n.e.key@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/4] builtin/index-pack.c: change xwrite to write_in_full to allow large sizes.
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2024 17:38:37 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zd0S7aUIG1bhGkaX@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240226220539.3494-2-randall.becker@nexbridge.ca>
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 05:05:35PM -0500, Randall S. Becker wrote:
> From: "Randall S. Becker" <rsbecker@nexbridge.com>
>
> This change is required because some platforms do not support file writes of
> arbitrary sizes (e.g, NonStop). xwrite ends up truncating the output to the
> maximum single I/O size possible for the destination device.
Hmm. I'm not sure I understand what NonStop's behavior is here...
> diff --git a/builtin/index-pack.c b/builtin/index-pack.c
> index a3a37bd215..f80b8d101a 100644
> --- a/builtin/index-pack.c
> +++ b/builtin/index-pack.c
> @@ -1571,7 +1571,7 @@ static void final(const char *final_pack_name, const char *curr_pack_name,
> * the last part of the input buffer to stdout.
> */
> while (input_len) {
> - err = xwrite(1, input_buffer + input_offset, input_len);
> + err = write_in_full(1, input_buffer + input_offset, input_len);
> if (err <= 0)
> break;
> input_len -= err;
> --
> 2.42.1
The code above loops while input_len is non-zero, and correctly
decrements it by the number of bytes written by xwrite() after each
iteration.
Assuming that xwrite()/write(2) works how I think it does on NonStop,
I'm not sure I understand why this change is necessary.
Thanks,
Taylor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-26 22:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-26 22:05 [PATCH v1 0/4] Change xwrite() to write_in_full() in builtins Randall S. Becker
2024-02-26 22:05 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] builtin/index-pack.c: change xwrite to write_in_full to allow large sizes Randall S. Becker
2024-02-26 22:38 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2024-02-26 22:51 ` rsbecker
2024-02-26 23:46 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-27 0:12 ` rsbecker
2024-02-26 23:30 ` rsbecker
2024-02-26 22:05 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] builtin/receive-pack.c: " Randall S. Becker
2024-02-26 23:02 ` rsbecker
2024-02-26 23:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-27 0:15 ` rsbecker
2024-02-26 22:05 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] builtin/repack.c: " Randall S. Becker
2024-02-26 23:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-27 8:20 ` Jeff King
2024-02-27 8:22 ` Jeff King
2024-02-26 22:05 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] builtin/unpack-objects.c: " Randall S. Becker
2024-02-26 23:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-02-27 0:18 ` rsbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zd0S7aUIG1bhGkaX@nand.local \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rsbecker@nexbridge.com \
--cc=the.n.e.key@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).