Re: What's cooking in git.git (Feb 2024, #07; Tue, 20)

[Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1657 bytes --]

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 08:44:18AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> >> * kn/for-all-refs (2024-02-12) 6 commits
> >>  - for-each-ref: add new option to include root refs
> >>  - ref-filter: rename 'FILTER_REFS_ALL' to 'FILTER_REFS_REGULAR'
> >>  - refs: introduce `refs_for_each_include_root_refs()`
> >>  - refs: extract out `loose_fill_ref_dir_regular_file()`
> >>  - refs: introduce `is_pseudoref()` and `is_headref()`
> >>  - Merge branch 'ps/reftable-backend' into kn/for-all-refs
> >>  (this branch uses ps/reftable-backend.)
> >>
> >>  "git for-each-ref" filters its output with prefixes given from the
> >>  command line, but it did not honor an empty string to mean "pass
> >>  everything", which has been corrected.
> >>
> >>  Will merge to 'next'?
> >>  source: <20240211183923.131278-1-karthik.188@gmail.com>
> >
> > Let me know if there's something more I could do here.
> 
> Hmph, I do not recall what the plan for this thing was.  Wasn't it
> ejected from 'next' so that its UI can be rethought?  Or did that
> happen already and what is in 'seen' already with a new UI?
> 
> Thanks.

This version already has the updated UI with `--include-root-refs`.
There has been some discussion around whether we want to refactor the
refname checking interfaces so that we do not have to introduce the two
new helper functions `is_pseudoref()` and `is_headref()`. But that would
result in a lot of churn, and we thus agreed that it is fine to do that
in a follow up patch series.

I then forgot to have a look at the remaining patches. I can do that
today.

Patrick

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]