From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>,
Eric Sunshine <sunshine@sunshineco.com>,
Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] add-patch: enforce only one-letter response to prompts
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 07:31:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zk7UsJjhY_FV2z8C@tanuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqh6ep1pwz.fsf_-_@gitster.g>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2789 bytes --]
On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 02:45:48PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> In a "git add -p" session, especially when we are not using the
> single-key mode, we may see 'qa' as a response to a prompt
>
> (1/2) Stage this hunk [y,n,q,a,d,j,J,g,/,e,p,?]?
>
> and then just do the 'q' thing (i.e. quit the session), ignoring
> everything other than the first byte.
>
> If 'q' and 'a' are next to each other on the user's keyboard, there
> is a plausible chance that we see 'qa' when the user who wanted to
> say 'a' fat-fingered and we ended up doing the 'q' thing instead.
>
> As we didn't think of a good reason during the review discussion why
> we want to accept excess letters only to ignore them, it appears to
> be a safe change to simply reject input that is longer than just one
> byte.
>
> The two exceptions are the 'g' command that takes a hunk number, and
> the '/' command that takes a regular expression. They have to be
> accompanied by their operands (this makes me wonder how users who
> set the interactive.singlekey configuration feed these operands---it
> turns out that we notice there is no operand and give them another
> chance to type the operand separately, without using single key
> input this time), so we accept a string that is more than one byte
> long.
>
> Keep the "use only the first byte, downcased" behaviour when we ask
> yes/no question, though. Neither on Qwerty or on Dvorak, 'y' and
> 'n' are not close to each other.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This version looks good to me, thanks!
> ---
> * Hopefully the final iteration. The differences are:
>
> - The end-user facing "here is what is wrong with your input"
> message is given with err() to be consistent with other such
> messages.
>
> - I gave up basing this on v2.44.0, as it is a new feature that
> does not have to be merged down to older maintenance tracks.
> This is now based on 80dbfac2 (Merge branch
> 'rj/add-p-typo-reaction', 2024-05-08), which is before v2.45.1
> but has modern enough t3701 and add-patch.c:err() sends its
> output to the standard output stream.
>
> - The tests for 'g' and '/' to check both the stuck and the split
> forms have been updated for the more recent prompt that
> includes 'p'.
>
> - The test for multi-key sequence expects the err() output on the
> standard output stream.
>
> As an experiment, this message has the range-diff at the end, not
> before the primary part of the patch text. I think this format
> should be easier to read for reviewers.
Huh, interesting. I do like that format better indeed. You did that
manually instead of using `--range-diff`, right?
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-23 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-21 0:37 [PATCH] add-patch: response to unknown command Rubén Justo
2024-05-21 7:03 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-21 12:59 ` Rubén Justo
2024-05-21 15:52 ` Re* " Junio C Hamano
2024-05-21 22:27 ` Taylor Blau
2024-05-21 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-21 23:20 ` [PATCH v2] add-patch: enforce only one-letter response to prompts Junio C Hamano
2024-05-21 23:36 ` Eric Sunshine
2024-05-22 0:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-22 6:40 ` Dragan Simic
2024-05-22 16:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-22 19:03 ` Dragan Simic
2024-05-22 20:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-22 11:07 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-22 16:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-22 17:14 ` [PATCH v3] " Junio C Hamano
2024-05-22 17:38 ` Rubén Justo
2024-05-22 19:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-22 21:45 ` [PATCH v4] " Junio C Hamano
2024-05-23 5:31 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-05-23 15:58 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zk7UsJjhY_FV2z8C@tanuki \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=dsimic@manjaro.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=sunshine@sunshineco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).