From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, karthik.188@gmail.com, emrass@google.com,
nasamuffin@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] doc: describe the project's decision-making process
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 07:58:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zkw39J_anOIk-zp1@tanuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa5kof5ql.fsf@gitster.g>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1288 bytes --]
On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:12:02PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com> writes:
>
> > The Git project currently operates according to an informal
> > consensus-building process, which is currently described in the
> > SubmittingPatches document. However, that focuses on small/medium-scale
> > patch series. For larger-scale decisions, the process is not as well
> > described. Document what to expect so that we have something concrete to
> > help inform newcomers to the project.
> >
> > This document explicitly does not aim to impose a formal process to
> > decision-making, nor to change pre-existing norms. Its only aim is to
> > describe how the project currently operates today.
> >
> > Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon <steadmon@google.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes in V4:
> > * Minor wording cleanups to be more emphatic and to clarify "other
> > specific implementation" phrase.
>
> Thanks for an update. I am myself undecided on the "explicit
> recommendation?" question Patrick posed, but other than that this
> iteration looked reasonable.
>
> Queued. Thanks.
I think the current version is good enough, we can still iterate on it
as needed. Thanks!
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-21 5:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-15 23:20 [RFC PATCH] doc: describe the project's decision-making process Josh Steadmon
2024-04-16 0:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-22 21:10 ` Josh Steadmon
2024-04-22 21:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-23 22:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-17 16:32 ` Enrico Mrass
2024-04-17 16:58 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-03 14:45 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-03 15:48 ` Josh Steadmon
2024-05-03 18:08 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-03 19:29 ` Taylor Blau
2024-05-06 7:12 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-06 20:14 ` Taylor Blau
2024-05-06 19:36 ` Josh Steadmon
2024-05-06 20:17 ` Taylor Blau
2024-04-22 18:41 ` Emily Shaffer
2024-04-22 19:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-04-22 21:12 ` Emily Shaffer
2024-04-23 1:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-09 0:01 ` [PATCH v2] " Josh Steadmon
2024-05-09 18:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-09 19:20 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-09 21:13 ` [PATCH 0/2] Describe patch-flow better in SubmittingPatches Junio C Hamano
2024-05-09 21:13 ` [PATCH 1/2] SubmittingPatches: move the patch-flow section earlier Junio C Hamano
2024-05-09 21:13 ` [PATCH 2/2] SubmittingPatches: extend the "flow" section Junio C Hamano
2024-05-10 10:08 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-05-10 15:59 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-10 19:09 ` Karthik Nayak
2024-05-10 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Describe life cycle of a patch series Junio C Hamano
2024-05-10 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] SubmittingPatches: move the patch-flow section earlier Junio C Hamano
2024-05-10 16:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] SubmittingPatches: extend the "flow" section Junio C Hamano
2024-05-10 16:56 ` [PATCH] decisions: focus on larger scale issues Junio C Hamano
2024-05-15 20:36 ` Josh Steadmon
2024-05-15 20:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-15 20:35 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Describe life cycle of a patch series Josh Steadmon
2024-05-16 21:20 ` [PATCH v3] doc: describe the project's decision-making process Josh Steadmon
2024-05-16 22:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-17 20:18 ` Josh Steadmon
2024-05-17 6:29 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-17 16:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-21 5:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-17 20:35 ` [PATCH v4] " Josh Steadmon
2024-05-17 22:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-21 5:58 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Zkw39J_anOIk-zp1@tanuki \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=emrass@google.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=nasamuffin@google.com \
--cc=steadmon@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).