From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from wfout8-smtp.messagingengine.com (wfout8-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C5E120EB for ; Tue, 21 May 2024 05:58:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.123.151 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716271099; cv=none; b=QHghbGtF6PwT2IEGfUUy9gg/T0VnB3h2ZFuO/arlrRTDherPfYTHz9mpYocRz4VJN4XsFdtKjWSnLpkftVMnb6hspQUdIFodIhmQBN+8OG/XRJD2Mfc1BtBJqY3vupYYMjOaCaMjiwzsTrZ0aQKFZ+2NJTrf8QWkfyzCs0fVRzU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1716271099; c=relaxed/simple; bh=IU10WtQQuwr/DTiKbVWHnyrCF0+ui5Ze0refKyw9iGs=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=HNxnEX0w6VV6Evn7l6eZWMvks9AoUifCrqFngRtmvHeZMk795n4LL4Cech0oe9rsJi0UMzKLbcos2SUhGG39L2r0c4DagREL9LVySxPqzqXl6pdKl7OTbSpcwPzMlxP6Eow5JBt/4f4RDb4wMY5RmdVqlWm0OHBnEBxKKYyiKo4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b=IwryTgJV; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=qw2yzRzy; arc=none smtp.client-ip=64.147.123.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b="IwryTgJV"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="qw2yzRzy" Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailfout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29BB71C00189; Tue, 21 May 2024 01:58:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 21 May 2024 01:58:17 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pks.im; h=cc:cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1716271096; x=1716357496; bh=u8NrMZta+r /MgqcLiPgpd7dkCCwM/MCdhBcaCz9N4QM=; b=IwryTgJVjcegXM+T4qCIYd+Cpv wzIbASy255gsokpgyOchRkKlqhfmZAzL6c165MSLSkWtm2Q9JwlsvfHhqNMrBO3F 54W5En3Zj654PcY2mlh370NXWOfPvy9iFtovQdupghU9G8gay4z6I2t/4OV+9/A7 dhgSmJIxMwZROIsgZaZ6d56CgElAleFYXJSdmxCZn9LyYXvBgjOX5X70RTxnpqOd w9uf4r1ko15GL7sj5p0M7flSVI7j+J05ZrUoizR01lYRrtaSLW+WSTRu1Z8dyd/T Vd3ufTGJuadf/iW40S4dFtLHQ7x3HnWkkBYI05vg4A6tj5/2+StOIT8S0KOA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; t=1716271096; x=1716357496; bh=u8NrMZta+r/MgqcLiPgpd7dkCCwM /MCdhBcaCz9N4QM=; b=qw2yzRzyRh/VT4Z45YqdjLUCTauC/2GSgdByAXdyvjaj 9RLA80sV2XF7TIDrio/KpziM3R/9XKCNeaHezIUiWJqVHZkyfPVDHY0SSWokiGuD gpaMbwAG4ClN5HH7bnrZfw+7mVlTIwX1/J7pZJAKQvPcHJhL2+OINNb1nUqEXaeL QjUWB3Hb1Q3BLos9ZclQZ7Y3r5qPrpqEwS6r+1DsUugeBlDgQTB2Wu9EE7M7oSA4 P6cNbz33iwThFDCdhzRxRtVgRPyedaFAtq8OuZBbUc1eVdZn/9gnjDEKBq2qq1L8 FSvkHPSjnieN/QX4ZeZH5g0/4/M8ucHnR36RmtnLUQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvledrvdeiuddgleelucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesghdtreertddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgrthhr ihgtkhcuufhtvghinhhhrghrughtuceophhssehpkhhsrdhimheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvg hrnhepueektdevtdffveeljeetgfehheeigeekleduvdeffeeghefgledttdehjeelffet necuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhsse hpkhhsrdhimh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i197146af:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 21 May 2024 01:58:15 -0400 (EDT) Received: by localhost (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0d5b3483 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 21 May 2024 05:58:13 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 07:58:12 +0200 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Josh Steadmon , git@vger.kernel.org, karthik.188@gmail.com, emrass@google.com, nasamuffin@google.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] doc: describe the project's decision-making process Message-ID: References: <10f217915600eda3ebec886e4f020f87c22e318a.1715978031.git.steadmon@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Eth8eFJNyJ8TnHxh" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: --Eth8eFJNyJ8TnHxh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, May 17, 2024 at 03:12:02PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Josh Steadmon writes: >=20 > > The Git project currently operates according to an informal > > consensus-building process, which is currently described in the > > SubmittingPatches document. However, that focuses on small/medium-scale > > patch series. For larger-scale decisions, the process is not as well > > described. Document what to expect so that we have something concrete to > > help inform newcomers to the project. > > > > This document explicitly does not aim to impose a formal process to > > decision-making, nor to change pre-existing norms. Its only aim is to > > describe how the project currently operates today. > > > > Helped-by: Junio C Hamano > > Signed-off-by: Josh Steadmon > > --- > > > > Changes in V4: > > * Minor wording cleanups to be more emphatic and to clarify "other > > specific implementation" phrase. >=20 > Thanks for an update. I am myself undecided on the "explicit > recommendation?" question Patrick posed, but other than that this > iteration looked reasonable. >=20 > Queued. Thanks. I think the current version is good enough, we can still iterate on it as needed. Thanks! Patrick --Eth8eFJNyJ8TnHxh Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEF9hrgiFbCdvenl/rVbJhu7ckPpQFAmZMN/MACgkQVbJhu7ck PpQwchAAlkayObNhaL+i8uML7D1I3y/sGITDU5PZBcXW9nSkWCqjUcM8T428XW+b sdeFkx1rqgs5Ovvm/+GOWfmqks/OTrabYOyOo2hy+EIRHj37Ah5ATM4cU9e/z92/ 2b3kOPCHNkonjPWpA5chTQaxP+xYdtzR7MJ3efUSJWbMJVvVg9+2Mk1GJpTJ3xb5 WKmJydJu1dsOiwLBxoKZ6VNnPR469zruJs4HDXiFzYcmlS6f7umWfTlIsgYicf5S J6rukFhmrxZc5JTeb9sbTNl2jxAj14Lrd+CsbH4ybsrR79S02oLUn671qiunVev6 ki80WNsgD97rjuToYP328hG8dVFQmo4DkIFrKn2M5kVWdc5RPDya0QzwM94g26np WI9YqhP+hsz+qcxfo1bM1ha8HJB9PbMMyHN21LA3hUc7kucGWRVm0DxBMZw97cZR a0kHg3aqoZT8xH01lRPz6Lx4X0NI/fHZh7OJgu0zQ2Jk42QYwxF2JPJDNAd+/IdF 2wGvo47tfIz5peff+LjOFCNrGIyjZB1Wq8D8swvF2Lsf5ujfL/Jftd/G/Rur0/fP CnzqLo6MwoyYaTTRFJ4ZboORK8+kexla+6tpPbdzsug6ds77Geqf+NWGoQhKI4gH 2Ibubb28sNHoa71ErXiEfBo/0MP8cZYxi5uI794OCEa1+XvTS5M= =VK95 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Eth8eFJNyJ8TnHxh--