git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
Subject: Re: [GSoC][PATCH v2 4/4] t: add test for put_be16() and improve test-case for parse_names()
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 11:30:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zlb1oiN6E4Isrnmg@tanuki> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240529070341.4248-5-chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2065 bytes --]

On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 12:25:12PM +0530, Chandra Pratap wrote:
> put_be16() is a function defined in reftable/basics.{c, h} for which
> there are no tests in the current setup. Add a test for the same and
> improve the existing test-case for parse_names().
> 
> Mentored-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
> Mentored-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>
> Signed-off-by: Chandra Pratap <chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>
> ---
>  t/unit-tests/t-reftable-basics.c | 16 ++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-basics.c b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-basics.c
> index b02ca02040..8372faec8c 100644
> --- a/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-basics.c
> +++ b/t/unit-tests/t-reftable-basics.c
> @@ -89,11 +89,13 @@ static void test_parse_names_normal(void)
>  
>  static void test_parse_names_drop_empty(void)
>  {
> -	char in[] = "a\n\n";
> +	char in[] = "a\n\nb\n";
>  	char **out = NULL;
>  	parse_names(in, strlen(in), &out);
>  	check_str(out[0], "a");
> -	check(!out[1]);
> +	/* simply '\n' should be dropped as empty string */
> +	check_str(out[1], "b");
> +	check(!out[2]);
>  	free_names(out);
>  }

I'd split out this change into yet another commit. Also, you say that
the test case is being "improved", but without mentioning what the
improvement actually is.

> @@ -123,14 +125,20 @@ static void test_common_prefix(void)
>  	strbuf_release(&b);
>  }
>  
> -static void test_u24_roundtrip(void)
> +static void test_be_roundtrip(void)
>  {
>  	uint32_t in = 0x112233;
>  	uint8_t dest[3];
>  	uint32_t out;
> +	/* test put_be24 and get_be24 roundtrip */
>  	put_be24(dest, in);
>  	out = get_be24(dest);
>  	check_int(in, ==, out);
> +	/* test put_be16 and get_be16 roundtrip */
> +	in = 0xfef1;
> +	put_be16(dest, in);
> +	out = get_be16(dest);
> +	check_int(in, ==, out);
>  }

Would it make sense to have separate tests for each of the variants
instead of one test for all of these? Might make things a bit easier to
follow.

Patrick

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 833 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-29  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <--in-reply-to=20240528113856.8348-1-chandrapratap3519@gmail.com>
2024-05-29  6:55 ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 0/4] t: port reftable/basics_test.c to the unit testing Chandra Pratap
2024-05-29  6:55   ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 1/4] t: move reftable/basics_test.c to the unit testing framework Chandra Pratap
2024-05-29  6:55   ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 2/4] t: move tests from reftable/stack_test.c to the new unit test Chandra Pratap
2024-05-29  6:55   ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 3/4] t: move tests from reftable/record_test.c " Chandra Pratap
2024-05-29  9:30     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-29 22:38       ` Junio C Hamano
2024-05-29  6:55   ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 4/4] t: add test for put_be16() and improve test-case for parse_names() Chandra Pratap
2024-05-29  9:30     ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2024-05-29  9:29   ` [GSoC][PATCH v2 0/4] t: port reftable/basics_test.c to the unit testing Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-29 16:59   ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 " Chandra Pratap
2024-05-29 16:59     ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 1/5] t: move reftable/basics_test.c to the unit testing framework Chandra Pratap
2024-05-29 16:59     ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 2/5] t: move tests from reftable/stack_test.c to the new unit test Chandra Pratap
2024-05-29 16:59     ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 3/5] t: move tests from reftable/record_test.c " Chandra Pratap
2024-05-29 16:59     ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 4/5] t: add test for put_be16() Chandra Pratap
2024-05-29 16:59     ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 5/5] t: improve the test-case for parse_names() Chandra Pratap
2024-05-30  4:35     ` [GSoC][PATCH v3 0/4] t: port reftable/basics_test.c to the unit testing Patrick Steinhardt
2024-05-30  7:52       ` Christian Couder
2024-05-30 14:33         ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zlb1oiN6E4Isrnmg@tanuki \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=chandrapratap3519@gmail.com \
    --cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).