From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3293C84A51 for ; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 07:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727162425; cv=none; b=SoUAXWPT+L6qpN+dqs4YfYvXFImxVBNrjk991H0j7Gb/QMois6ThdpNOtUbU6fe/BmQahHkAjFhkdDcvbB95Bpn+5gw1gstzVkt/tSQY1mfPBcl6oUM25iU+EMrMme4LOLy8sKETYuC0gtiBrRohAWg5Rxp4hU8bDl/0z0a4tqQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727162425; c=relaxed/simple; bh=aLXmqdJZv4m9cKwFhptuDq2c+E/fTdM9nXWPD99noT8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=dtsY+kQBYWICxvGEKfaP2njyCnGqesyaiouzZHddP2LF8OOiFEckIa6yB2zQZIM4axH6yJGXA7s7i4yNM1Itk7kqzLzFz+Gxkj8bFHBvAn0u51lQdcFec+eUHHV6mAxWh2XEA2+Nk+Ccf0thkgXUBBNy19tCYll0gjOAXYMGp3g= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b=CHxuumFT; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=XIxVpqWv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b="CHxuumFT"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="XIxVpqWv" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.phl.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 535EC1140338; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 03:20:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 24 Sep 2024 03:20:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pks.im; h=cc:cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1727162419; x=1727248819; bh=U5Er9ufbBS FmfaAMRKclxLgKPXGL5yVSKPdCqnzgCMg=; b=CHxuumFTs37Vxa0hCWm8ACcQJx JhTXNqYHBrypJ13rmZyl5UemaS3d4bq3VbqTmnxtSRoRMYKkMZ0tpucxoYg0QFMz uAwJGd8pDEkHFqhn6D0pQJL0ISnn4Z9eLeHSX+v5be6YSPZBMYyFadoliS89/+Jx 3HnhvKTeYTY6evrbRr+c2u8nuRJ0D1d2WO2tKWsdWG76vx3/rac4sPLIWLGA0k7O XssZDh23uCJ0D4UCYOe3o4HzeJEUOyj2ec4dBDv4a6EMk5FJlrckIhN4i1oaAPML 6w1LEplc+UHZQkufl/4ntRidWAiG457Gd0iIgc6epPWDzb94xYQZ2HiLOrMw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm2; t=1727162419; x=1727248819; bh=U5Er9ufbBSFmfaAMRKclxLgKPXGL 5yVSKPdCqnzgCMg=; b=XIxVpqWvrxzeobt7WUZeLNAdm8CbdGHhVdnMhw3HGaAc K1tG+LgZBHluxHTAZlgLgA2SyFnIujGR3CLlQjjPzqMCkq0HYpt2JTAb9BLKCat7 uGs6CVjBvnIO8MFowkI+Ya8BXhvLBsjtdVC8bPSTvCVa4PO8NgkZ0VlgjtmNMydV /P9QmkcWlfitY7enKcKQVLiPZotrz7GjVHVf8bQh18mER0wspJMqg0cnz1DK46uv stMjS3cR42053d4XcAqYSFTRLLjU0SaID5VG9uAVkIQk19q8+UpsgX/RUH+QGhcY HsZ8S/aYpJsrZclv+oyVjpDuDsIYPjFntDMDTuaBlA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvddtuddgkeeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvve fukfhfgggtuggjsehttdertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefrrghtrhhitghkucfuthgvihhn hhgrrhguthcuoehpshesphhkshdrihhmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeevkeekfffhie dtleduiefgjedttedvledvudehgfeugedugffhueekhfejvdektdenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpshesphhkshdrihhmpdhnsg gprhgtphhtthhopedvpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtshht vghrsehpohgsohigrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvghrnhgvlh drohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i197146af:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 03:20:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: by vm-mail (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 0e74d533 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 24 Sep 2024 07:19:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 09:20:13 +0200 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] Memory leak fixes (pt.7) Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 11:54:38AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Patrick Steinhardt writes: > > > The patch series is built on top of ed155187b4 (Sync with Git 2.46.1, > > 2024-09-13) with ps/leakfixes-part-6 at 46f6ca2a68 (builtin/repack: fix > > leaking keep-pack list, 2024-09-05) merged into it. > > I haven't said this, but I really appreciate contributors (like you) > pacing their series submission perfectly with the rate of related > topics in flight solidifying. If people hold off sending new and > dependent topics for too long, that would waste available review and > testing bandwidth, but if people send them while the other topics > that they depend on are not yet in a good shape, it would require > conflict resolutions that may get wasted when the depended topics > have to be updated. > > I've been trying to be more explicit in the "What's cooking" report > what my evaluation of each topic's "doneness" is, to help contributors > who need to send new topics that may conflict with the topics that > are already cooking, and I hope it helped in your (and other > contributors') pacing their submissions to help the process run more > smoothly. This series of patch series was something where I wasn't immediately sure for how well-received it will be. In order to make progress and not be busy with memory leak fixes for the next couple years I had to keep a steady pace that wasn't too slow. But sending out a 20-patch series every other week could feel overwhelming to some folks. So I'm happy to hear that this is well-received overall. Thanks, and also thanks for your reviews! Patrick