From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.145]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B49F519DFB5 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 10:14:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.145 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727777666; cv=none; b=eNdeWiIRbe/ErWLRuO22b/V/XYmadzWOaph/WjBZzBIyKn4gaRFKgKff5K8B+aRki6Ai4vJr65nyvOcMCwkiucw8aObE+MkgFJZ1mn9QdtjGsLJwDmOwsbsq/VgKHZUile966ND/iZvD4F1Sq8tZQb3cl9/1Lj74X+uZHhiJ750= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727777666; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cgFxC//PJEg12P02Ev3ZxKMv88ergrmRHN63Z6gmo64=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=N43jomEQJkV2mdeaDIlMZ5F2GEpqNXHNzv2vevgCv2dGarh6tW5B0OBVp1ttN6W7SuJB9eSLj6+T1fftJOCb3/F7iZC2n/IfGaj7XKRM0gPfWVbRP/442FjnIVBx6c0b8Kq2i04JvMApluvOpj9vj/P3sSPoN1neQxi2GOo++YA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b=XMcMd5EU; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=fBSY/U5d; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.145 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b="XMcMd5EU"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="fBSY/U5d" Received: from phl-compute-08.internal (phl-compute-08.phl.internal [10.202.2.48]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FA31381D5C; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 06:14:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-08.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 01 Oct 2024 06:14:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pks.im; h=cc:cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:date:date :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1727777663; x=1727864063; bh=7QB0MH8yhuLH+8V1oPLIfymIZYlRqVRji0OEYZm//xs=; b= XMcMd5EUie8pn0ty6enRe7lQwMmgnGM5DJ/JdHI1V2i4qS8vnIaMl87nPkQi/5sL jqk859zI5Yohgr8Gs3r2Eq/MIMtkz0aIBNxYPj3K6U/x5dAU8xQSfqbCN7rnou4Y y7gnekF+2Piv2Dtkvaj8GZV6HrA4EpPYPyyK8Kjf3fSUM/QTseFzj69SYdLRJdTj JaNM1vOBW+2BM0yV6qg2sKukecci9TVCEJZfh+FHqu7oX+dFSFjndl8IkRA/THIK HWH6bZaJ5EqCGvERzPVHGdVmbCOgX73OoVKJwpn3VRMNv7Yz/gL4zX42dy/i1Wu0 GZK4d16IxblNVgtGcWGw+g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-transfer-encoding :content-type:content-type:date:date:feedback-id:feedback-id :from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:reply-to:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1727777663; x= 1727864063; bh=7QB0MH8yhuLH+8V1oPLIfymIZYlRqVRji0OEYZm//xs=; b=f BSY/U5dsY6Bkm6TUR60pD+7xhf+ysqq5gsHNniTSuRlSqDi8R1YTJ6bGyVPI6uRf xzWmE2CdDkIpyV8E7zbjruALyoNjshj9RcWryVsTBF00i2N+WVL89ekFMeXDKaXO 36RL9c8X10TPOHkKQYqv1ZAqfeh4Z017d2KNhOLhlCB3d276cjvH/iaYzyVHM2gB 88H+ZP/det7oDl+SBqEQqMrOh5CVLxiE5y98G8YjRdWioCg6xkpVmnkyltJ9Lvk4 tyTXxDJV+8jvoAxqBEnRxIYwTI8MX9a4mBnpOSXLIz217k1M2tLLVJeZP4aYPpgK UseA/e/yP2RPXJUzsKYTA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeftddrvddujedgvdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfu rfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnh htshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggugfgjsehtkeertddttdej necuhfhrohhmpefrrghtrhhitghkucfuthgvihhnhhgrrhguthcuoehpshesphhkshdrih hmqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpedvfeejiedtteelheeiteekveeftdefvdehkedvveet ffdvveevjeejleegtedvgfenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpehpshesphhkshdrihhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeekpdhmohguvgep shhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhopegthhhrihhsthhirghnrdgtohhuuggvrhesghhmrg hilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehmhhgrghhgvghrsegrlhhumhdrmhhithdrvgguuhdp rhgtphhtthhopehjohhhnhgtrghikeeisehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepmh gvsehtthgrhihlohhrrhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehsuhhnshhhihhnvgesshhunhhs hhhinhgvtghordgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepshgrnhgurghlshestghruhhsthihthhooh hthhhprghsthgvrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtgho mhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i197146af:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 1 Oct 2024 06:14:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: by vm-mail (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 95030ad6 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Tue, 1 Oct 2024 10:13:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 12:14:17 +0200 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: Christian Couder Cc: Junio C Hamano , git@vger.kernel.org, John Cai , Taylor Blau , Eric Sunshine , Michael Haggerty , "brian m. carlson" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce a "promisor-remote" capability Message-ID: References: <20240731134014.2299361-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> <20240910163000.1985723-1-christian.couder@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 11:17:48AM +0200, Christian Couder wrote: > On Mon, Sep 30, 2024 at 9:57 AM Patrick Steinhardt wrote: > > I think chipping away the problems one by one is fine. But it would be > > nice to draw something like a "big picture" of where we eventually want > > to end up at and how all the parts connect with each other to form a > > viable native replacement for Git LFS. > > I have tried to discuss this at the Git Merge 2022 and 2024 and > perhaps even before that. But as you know it's difficult to make > people agree on big projects that are not backed by patches and that > might span over several years (especially when very few people > actually work on them and when they might have other things to work on > too). Certainly true, yeah. But we did have documents in the past that outlined long-term visions in our tree, and it may help the project as a whole to better understand the long-term vision we're headed into. And by encouraging discussion up front we may be able to spot any weaknesses and address them before it is too late. Patrick