From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: Piotr Szlazak <piotr.szlazak@gmail.com>,
Piotr Szlazak via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Christian Couder <chriscool@tuxfamily.org>,
David Turner <dturner@twosigma.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] upload-pack: fix how ALLOW_ANY_SHA1 flag is disabled
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:46:00 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZxLXGG8+VUWydsle@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241018043306.GB2408674@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Fri, Oct 18, 2024 at 12:33:06AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 02:46:45PM -0400, Taylor Blau wrote:
>
> > > Rather not as config file is parsed only once:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/git/git/blob/15030f9556f545b167b1879b877a5d780252dc16/upload-pack.c#L1368
> >
> > I am not sure I follow... upload_pack_config() is invoked on every
> > configuration line that we see. So the first time when we read
> > "allowAnySHA1InWant = true", we take the first path through that
> > function you linked. The second time, we take the else branch, and
> > correspondingly unset the bits from ALLOW_ANY_SHA1.
> >
> > So today that is doing the right thing (it will end with the same bits
> > set that we started with). But under the proposed patch that behavior
> > would change, and the lower two bits would still be set.
>
> Reading Piotr's response I wondered if upload-pack might be using the
> configset API instead of a config callback. But no, it does look like a
> config callback.
Yeah... I was pretty sure that was the case thinking back to 6dd3456a8c
(upload-pack.c: allow banning certain object filter(s), 2020-08-03),
which somehow was already more than four years ago :-<.
> But it does hint at a possible path if we wanted to process these
> independently: we could read each of the config options separately,
> resolving them in the usual last-one-wins way, and then turning the
> result into a bitfield. Something like this, outside of the callback
> (totally untested):
>
> int v;
> unsigned bits = 0;
>
> if (!git_config_get_bool("uploadpack.allowtipsha1inwant", &v) && v)
> bits |= ALLOW_TIP_SHA1;
> if (!git_config_get_bool("uploadpack.allowreachablesha1inwant", &v) && v)
> bits |= ALLOW_REACHABLE_SHA1;
> if (!git_config_get_bool("uploadpack.allowanysha1inwant", &v) && v)
> bits |= ALLOW_ANY_SHA1;
>
> That makes the config flags independent. But the features themselves are
> not really independent. If you do:
>
> [uploadpack]
> allowAnySHA1InWant = true
> allowTipSHA1InWant = false
>
> it is still going to allow the "tip" flag, because it's a subset of the
> "any" flag. And you can't escape that.
Yup.
> So I still think we're better off to just document (and of course in the
> long run all of these become less and less interesting as they are
> v0-only options).
I agree completely. I think the consensus here seems to be that, if
anything, we should update the documentation and move on :-).
Thanks,
Taylor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-18 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-16 21:06 [PATCH] upload-pack: fix how ALLOW_ANY_SHA1 flag is disabled Piotr Szlazak via GitGitGadget
2024-10-16 21:18 ` Taylor Blau
2024-10-17 2:37 ` Jeff King
2024-10-17 15:23 ` Taylor Blau
2024-10-17 15:59 ` Piotr Szlazak
2024-10-17 18:46 ` Taylor Blau
2024-10-18 4:33 ` Jeff King
2024-10-18 21:46 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2024-10-19 16:39 ` [PATCH v2] doc: document how uploadpack.allowAnySHA1InWant impact other allow options Piotr Szlazak via GitGitGadget
2024-10-19 16:46 ` Piotr Szlazak
2024-10-21 5:55 ` Piotr Szlazak
2024-10-21 19:03 ` Jeff King
2024-10-21 19:47 ` Taylor Blau
2024-10-21 19:48 ` Taylor Blau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZxLXGG8+VUWydsle@nand.local \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=chriscool@tuxfamily.org \
--cc=dturner@twosigma.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
--cc=piotr.szlazak@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).