Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] midx: add repository to `multi_pack_index` struct

[Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>]

On Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 03:32:34PM +0100, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> The `multi_pack_index` struct represents the MIDX for a repository.
> Here, we add a pointer to the repository in this struct, allowing direct
> use of the repository variable without relying on the global
> `the_repository` struct.
>
> With this addition, we can determine the repository associated with a
> `bitmap_index` struct. A `bitmap_index` points to either a `packed_git`
> or a `multi_pack_index`, both of which have direct repository
> references. To support this, we introduce a static helper function,
> `bitmap_repo`, in `pack-bitmap.c`, which retrieves a repository given a
> `bitmap_index`.
>
> With this, we clear up all usages of `the_repository` within
> `pack-bitmap.c` and also remove the `USE_THE_REPOSITORY_VARIABLE`
> definition. Bringing us another step closer to remove all global
> variable usage.
>
> Although this change also opens up the potential to clean up `midx.c`,
> doing so would require additional refactoring to pass the repository
> struct to functions where the MIDX struct is created: a task better
> suited for future patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
> ---
>  midx.c        |  1 +
>  midx.h        |  3 ++
>  pack-bitmap.c | 97 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
>  3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/midx.c b/midx.c
> index 8edb75f51d..7a34473010 100644
> --- a/midx.c
> +++ b/midx.c
> @@ -131,6 +131,7 @@ static struct multi_pack_index *load_multi_pack_index_one(const char *object_dir
>  	m->data = midx_map;
>  	m->data_len = midx_size;
>  	m->local = local;
> +	m->r = the_repository;

Same note here about calling this 'r' rather than 'repo'.

I do wonder if it creates any awkwardness to have the_repository
assigned here unconditionally when we do specify the object_dir. I think
it's OK so long as we don't start replacing 'm->object_dir' with
'm->repo->objects->odb->path'.

> @@ -1980,18 +1997,23 @@ struct bitmap_index *prepare_bitmap_walk(struct rev_info *revs,
>  	if (!use_boundary_traversal)
>  		object_array_clear(&revs->pending);
>
> +	repo = bitmap_repo(bitmap_git);
> +
>  	if (haves) {
> -		if (use_boundary_traversal) {
> -			trace2_region_enter("pack-bitmap", "haves/boundary", the_repository);
> +		if (use_boundary_traversal)
> +		{
> +			trace2_region_enter("pack-bitmap", "haves/boundary", repo);
>  			haves_bitmap = find_boundary_objects(bitmap_git, revs, haves);
> -			trace2_region_leave("pack-bitmap", "haves/boundary", the_repository);
> -		} else {
> -			trace2_region_enter("pack-bitmap", "haves/classic", the_repository);
> +			trace2_region_leave("pack-bitmap", "haves/boundary", repo);
> +		}
> +		else
> +		{
> +			trace2_region_enter("pack-bitmap", "haves/classic", repo);
>  			revs->ignore_missing_links = 1;
>  			haves_bitmap = find_objects(bitmap_git, revs, haves, NULL);
>  			reset_revision_walk();
>  			revs->ignore_missing_links = 0;
> -			trace2_region_leave("pack-bitmap", "haves/classic", the_repository);
> +			trace2_region_leave("pack-bitmap", "haves/classic", repo);
>  		}

Odd braces?

Thanks,
Taylor