From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2024, #02; Fri, 1)
Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2024 10:29:17 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZyjoTVhP0xn/Qcvx@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqr07rwsmd.fsf@gitster.g>
On Sun, Nov 03, 2024 at 08:05:46PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Thanks everybody, especially Taylor, for keeping things going while
> I was away. Unfortunately, we seem to have acquired way too many
> topics that were posted and picked up without getting reviewed. As
> we discussed a few months ago in <xmqqployf6z5.fsf@gitster.g>, I'll
> start discarding topics that have seen no activities for 3 or more
> weeks. Interested parties can of course revive these topics.
Welcome back, and thanks for trusting me to keep the patches moving
between integration branches while you were gone.
> With all the integration branches and topics broken out:
>
> https://github.com/gitster/git/
Now that we are no longer referring to my tree here to list the
broken-out topics, I have cleaned out topics besides my own that would
ordinarily reside in this tree.
> [Graduated to 'master']
>
> * ds/path-walk-1 (2024-10-31) 6 commits
> - path-walk: mark trees and blobs as UNINTERESTING
> - path-walk: visit tags and cached objects
> - path-walk: allow consumer to specify object types
> - t6601: add helper for testing path-walk API
> - test-lib-functions: add test_cmp_sorted
> - path-walk: introduce an object walk by path
>
> Introduce a new API to visit objects in batches based on a common
> path, or by type.
>
> Under discussion.
> cf. <ZyUqr/wb5K4Og9j9@nand.local>
> source: <pull.1818.git.1730356023.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
This is marked as "Graduated to 'master'", although I suspect it isn't.
I thought that it would have been because the topic went away, although
I still see this in 'jch' via your 3503a15e17 (Merge branch
'kh/bundle-docs' into jch, 2024-11-03).
Perhaps this WC report was generated before moving the topic back into
'jch'? In either event, as noted by <ZyUqr/wb5K4Og9j9@nand.local>, this
topic is still under discussion and is not ready to be merged (yet).
> * tb/cross-pack-delta-reuse (2024-10-11) 11 commits
> . pack-bitmap: enable reusing deltas with base objects in 'haves' bitmap
> . pack-bitmap.c: record whether the result was filtered
> . pack-bitmap: enable cross-pack delta reuse
> . t5332: enable OFS_DELTAs via test_pack_objects_reused
> . write_reused_pack_one(): translate bit positions directly
> . pack-bitmap: drop `from_midx` field from `bitmapped_pack`
> . pack-bitmap.c: extract `find_base_bitmap_pos()`
> . pack-bitmap.c: compare `base_offset` to `delta_obj_offset`
> . pack-bitmap.c: delay calling 'offset_to_pack_pos()'
> . pack-bitmap.c: avoid unnecessary `offset_to_pack_pos()`
> . pack-bitmap.c: do not pass `pack_pos` to `try_partial_reuse()`
>
> Allow pack-objects to reuse an existing delta in a packfile, when
> it ends up sending the base object from a different packfile.
>
> Needs review.
> source: <cover.1728505840.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
This topic was ejected, which is fine since it hasn't seen any review in
a few weeks. It's on my list of things to resend.
> * tb/incremental-midx-part-2 (2024-10-04) 17 commits
> . fixup! pack-bitmap.c: open and store incremental bitmap layers
> . fixup! midx: implement writing incremental MIDX bitmaps
> . midx: implement writing incremental MIDX bitmaps
> . pack-bitmap.c: use `ewah_or_iterator` for type bitmap iterators
> . pack-bitmap.c: keep track of each layer's type bitmaps
> . ewah: implement `struct ewah_or_iterator`
> . pack-bitmap.c: apply pseudo-merge commits with incremental MIDXs
> . pack-bitmap.c: compute disk-usage with incremental MIDXs
> . pack-bitmap.c: teach `rev-list --test-bitmap` about incremental MIDXs
> . pack-bitmap.c: support bitmap pack-reuse with incremental MIDXs
> . pack-bitmap.c: teach `show_objects_for_type()` about incremental MIDXs
> . pack-bitmap.c: teach `bitmap_for_commit()` about incremental MIDXs
> . pack-bitmap.c: open and store incremental bitmap layers
> . pack-revindex: prepare for incremental MIDX bitmaps
> . Documentation: describe incremental MIDX bitmaps
> . Merge branch 'tb/pseudo-merge-bitmap-fixes' into tb/incremental-midx-part-2
> . Merge branch 'tb/incremental-midx-part-1' into tb/incremental-midx-part-2
>
> Incremental updates of multi-pack index files.
>
> Needs review.
> source: <cover.1723760847.git.me@ttaylorr.com>
> source: <ZwBsbW5jsFw0mxKk@nand.local>
Ditto.
Thanks,
Taylor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-04 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-04 4:05 What's cooking in git.git (Nov 2024, #02; Fri, 1) Junio C Hamano
2024-11-04 15:29 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2024-11-04 22:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-05 1:51 ` Derrick Stolee
2024-11-05 20:54 ` Bence Ferdinandy
2024-11-06 0:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2024-11-09 8:51 ` Bence Ferdinandy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ZyjoTVhP0xn/Qcvx@nand.local \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).