From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.215.180 ARC-Seal: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; t=1794563474; b=rgl7g66ZmOR9DC/FjIibS69u1+ecwwJzrjMHQmUndtJianJ+EESFwwaZ5QPEU5aAA4Ks CVEHI/MOXJujBVOZ3DDK/FU0nAqWXcdpyMLSGQqmFUm/V9XOD8VMwK0MkmfTkh97J3Xnx IhkJZj3W9+XJ/XGQnAauzsMmvjEPDL6Z5HTMbrJphE9gtVQiyz1Fv0VHOEbhaGsZg6fl5 5h89vsGslxyG3jze43k0E/3nw+QmcZ20ecGFqzS0b0+eC/GiTizI3WIlwRFhLxbkXDtdB QMbludl9uHyGlY9WR2QmzNYA6qhMRz9P6l4ide5M+XJCSSkVYYFkYtxViYgT0xy/aEA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc20261015; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1794563474; h=DMARC-Filter:Received:DKIM-Signature:X-Google-DKIM-Signature: X-Gm-Message-State:X-Gm-Gg:X-Received:Received:Message-ID:Date: MIME-Version:User-Agent:Subject:To:Cc:References:Content-Language: From:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=GmROSvo2dV+e8Xp4NG3wXnZYYTpuwt4iYSAaT72/unc=; b=fCP5lVdaNt3eoEdYWx7Rkhv5SF2qK0ei65eSkitNCp3AUlvKhnHSwuLKu7VYvxY2tn17 qAQ8McVUSYu+C9xcs0EaRyDFOhHpM1p/6j5vxiFwmLPe6pEsW50f4Cz7Ry8sQ586mVFQB 2pdm125jOx6leX66Ix9Byf/aX9Q8e5pHMaZQveLLNB1ScorF4aHRI4PFXx+MqFYcrnvki CC0tG1cjzdcEPM4CXOUYLY6Onl4jzr2oyuMNciUzmcG/GFl/RdSGDnXDh0SrkcQOPO+gj mZ7h0CFLpEeodN98nPrpYlileZgevUjMoRiB6HPx/CnnmeTnMBWOuBKybIH8iooh60A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20260707 header.b=tELzqeAN; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=209.85.215.180 Received: from mail-pg1-f180.google.com (mail-pg1-f180.google.com [209.85.215.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4301F606A32E for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 09:51:13 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 smtp.subspace.kernel.org 4301F606A32E Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=20260707 header.b=tELzqeAN Received: by mail-pg1-f180.google.com with SMTP id 41be03b00d2f7-cdb1199bfd8so319261a12.1 for ; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 01:51:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20260707; t=1794563473; x=1795168273; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to :content-type; bh=GmROSvo2dV+e8Xp4NG3wXnZYYTpuwt4iYSAaT72/unc=; b=tELzqeAN4LyHKocNg7cLWa9gMghJneeBM9lxOpkVBrNEuMHZYINz4PnucnKpcBFFC5 BEd6wSQlG3iUXZd/l+YnqfeBvs4g+muHZsfYnoV73VTHy+aza+115kvAxLK6/I2WLVl0 smHWu3V9y2BpTNf7Wnmuibcw+qM1YsYVfuYaFu8LHY2fBqIRbHRpz+ltgKmS7n5ZjMuQ G77R7Pak6wYfplgBk/wPMKzft8zL03dYkOj2SFgUaTz8tqpP3WCh25pxBezv2sGn1As+ Bdc3GafCORy8iaSdga1INK0vmPN8F9PklOOP8I6QhlUdkSbfBC3qkO1lorPBn/521J7m 06mQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20260707; t=1794563473; x=1795168273; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:from :content-language:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent:mime-version :date:message-id:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to:content-type; bh=GmROSvo2dV+e8Xp4NG3wXnZYYTpuwt4iYSAaT72/unc=; b=vfb+nfTwzlApoQvGNQ9Q+oazatS8aEzcMsxOGT4E2n/W8/UtbOUBNo+b+W7R+rF3Tr 0sAyVZU/pS2PTmVKXKUlZ2xHTtoiDuj5JX2JxZorc/EQ2VTGkohXz0JyO6UyFN7Da/nR /LRbOTanvHBM/C7HseGZGlTF5Moz+0E/gPZqr9/4dHUyb9eyWMqc6d4UxbWa7x1EtaQr K6ATtgrjQYb7DoaqX+ZoXv/jcMS5K7Jzt6HTWDSESYV4xXls5apnaYh0Y9RYyKC5q+kE EMMlK9nmRNwZwG7fJii7fz3BekwdVSjfyq/l/7xyH3bqvenHp/DRi32g3H6gGR4WXY9V 8Jyw== X-Gm-Message-State: APuU4Z8DqvlDJCGgAuoJ0VHKz/Jo3UxPyYaOUIa7ryi23AbQ5/Xm/gQX CEB9uk+1RGwsXJPZRz1Pel6q1HblSTRWqxDsE/D2OpGWMGs8E7sOSiyvwl3cug== X-Gm-Gg: AYBFou1ei/md+ZU2qnayrY3XQsPtzTqSkrJ066z1ZEeQMRWQ7KTvQIpPEnNqeFRDf2D aGbSGfjagRF2+8De7v5vRKz3AMd4NaqFpydXCK32S0w/UhdN4PgGDx5IxP9xzks7Sy6zodH5yjH 2YcKjVhYSEShxTrcKwKoGDcU3mZUtwn9snENdbrEw5QuxotsliHj9vpdc6/H0x4MvFH9tZGsVuk rBckFIpubITL2XdDbBCoieGdOa65nobC1ZyoZxEX29K15L+lJq8KqQ219ixCt1TKH3e/r9+HkOL aIbg2twzDwCrR5y4cLkXIKOUiKo/SbqNZcbrH1hEWmUUESX6E6/aOYsexQ0ld3NbOntkvFMnK2f 2E3uNqh9Cqtl+u6Jnxndj7DaHFyjlCiuif+UqIA1bwA6xkUDB5FxbrUZ/Tpn0QG2o7Y9355zYUl LLfEJENCCVaWHcY6q4SJ5hjz6W2f2xovejP3tevVCjSd9zI0FMEEzkjgwZZgQEVcp8mOIIc/tcp x9mR6pc4Na7rKSXIGzHDmUR4IEb8QpSQgBYNBCvb4zjJMqO1Y4OYDiblk9tvjIsuEJ9/LtPwRTl Q2Edhxl16nE2a5OgWDO9F1Sr1XJL+ktxZR/J49G5MCYF X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:39ab:b0:3ac:80dc:f40a with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-3b1b0a1f081mr1535667a91.16.1794563473199; Fri, 13 Nov 2026 01:51:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.25.219] ([115.108.41.154]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-3b1aec63b9bsm3872236a91.12.2026.11.13.01.51.11 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 13 Nov 2026 01:51:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2026 15:21:09 +0530 X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: List-Owner: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [Outreachy][PATCH] promisor-remote: honor promisor.fetchOrder when trying remotes To: Tatchou Yopa Nelly Cc: git@vger.kernel.org References: <20261104172434.691381-1-yopatatchou@gmail.com> <894327d9-57b5-4adc-b300-25d946211606@gmail.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Kaartic Sivaraam In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 11/6/26 04:25, Tatchou Yopa Nelly wrote: > Hi Tanga, > Next time try to make sure the person you are writing to is in the To/Cc fields as appropriate. Otherwise, there is a chance that they will not even receive your message since not everyone reads the list by subscribing to it.> Kaartic, I've also re-read SubmittingPatches#describe-changes and > rewritten the commit message to describe the change rather than > address the reviewers directly. That is good! > On the RFC point: I treated the > Phase 2 config work as the micro-patch and skipped the RFC step > you pointed out. Should I step back and send the design RFC first, > or keep the current patch as a prototype while we discuss the > config shape on the list? > I think treating the current patch as a RFC patch and discussing the shape is a good idea. The only concern I have is that this patch is submitted in the context of Outreachy and the candidate that we may potentially pick will work[note 1] on this during their Outreachy internship period. So, discussing this now sounds a little premature to me Of course, I don't mean to suggest that no two people should work on related areas. I'm just thinking it might be ideal to avoid premature work among Outreachy contributors before even the Outreachy selections are out. [note 1]: During the candidate discussion, it may also happen that we may not pick a candidate for the project. It is totally fine to work on this in that case as there will be no conflicts. But none of this is clear now, TBH. -- Sivaraam