From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-b7-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-b7-smtp.messagingengine.com [202.12.124.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F0AC91EB1AA for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 07:43:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.158 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745307804; cv=none; b=a1EzRsdJNyvRHRegWcu9I1izGEJmQpXzG1ZG2B2uyO53H+Y9NvQHHtTHbk/W1u9Zal6StZjV1NOlK/Hgr1X3rkd5bUJOX+kaD+YZaWBRwZA/TpldnrcwbN1MkGwFcahLkIlHZvREkymhsaLRUu93D5ghNnyY32CnoLZ0DDsBzJQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745307804; c=relaxed/simple; bh=inIco1Ik2DcIA7Om4U/rtqWEiPvHAV6vJyLwbCEkq9s=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=UNFNaE0KlFQPAtDAUIRENsHJ6qzN0MWoRX7FadrdzMy/LNHPAwp9UEGb9RN7YuHXRlqB0H3M1qLDXv5ZmxuoOPb4wjeBFU1EC5c6c85tW6oKCi8amD4ctUTcunI80beCTIseItoWjDLMK3vLH9vvhZJkkN24HNA59S0VjqV2fNE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b=S1olf7yo; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=bEee14Hs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.12.124.158 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b="S1olf7yo"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="bEee14Hs" Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.phl.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.stl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3E4254022C; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 03:43:21 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 22 Apr 2025 03:43:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pks.im; h=cc:cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1745307801; x=1745394201; bh=/l4m0wQvTT NIwr2ZQ6r0+kUpm/A0kwliXpF0x/Cynas=; b=S1olf7yom9XpDL5nw804wQlKJv oKKqZ8THfJRiZfP5SRR5/2YP/5tc5+hyeg1CFTNQJLNsMoC28dpYaJKkEAsGrRr9 LX95KgD6ZmCH6JMjzwHamu2KI3EjZ5uB1uynDv+UdwPROlHZjIGdWVqSRNteHwq/ lGp86A6J8LTkc0ycidrr+0YD19LOY/DeF9JdMn0OdnspPoNiE5Hdb+cYdXbu70jp PD3WgWoXChcHNHE0ky04GgnR/uD03plf+ykQIIhhf7a6n8JWjlI0HWpj+GSqC3YX lgWYLYmBdDAtlAFaSSDkiOClJVPmbFvRoVv0QuDqNaNFL9/bPtXBF+f8em+Q== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1745307801; x=1745394201; bh=/l4m0wQvTTNIwr2ZQ6r0+kUpm/A0kwliXpF 0x/Cynas=; b=bEee14HsXB7GTMv9R5Z/kzGke+JvYw+1iLHUR8ZX+Z8ghFyJmeI Wd252bJ87iJvFyxo+AE+mPxPMAMVPyQpwklVebxJyYpIyUFcWXydqeHfKON9sPhM o/XsnwJjdhNREJi6gkj+dUkAS/bPv33R1S2R2qfsPC9zuQXFUJ9mYbeFLzroxIaW UTGBkdQZgwzWqg6F1kf9l/aqg7QhNNueElilLadSQlTmybtbXggNSmm1IpuHoC8P IUEUf8jGlAdnlX7ALU8hn4odi/yfgpJtHFi0mpK5q0qh1cKe3bfryNSxDpo36SUg Wzyi4fDjomZWSvSt31ZQ2lMHw8kfSqUs0ew== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddvgeefudejucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddt vdenucfhrhhomheprfgrthhrihgtkhcuufhtvghinhhhrghrughtuceophhssehpkhhsrd himheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephfeigfdvffdvtdeuhfelgfelhefgfeevueetffdu gfehtefgveelhfeuueevuedvnecuffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhenucevlh hushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehpshesphhkshdr ihhmpdhnsggprhgtphhtthhopeefpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthhope hgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepjhhohhgrnhhnvghs rdhstghhihhnuggvlhhinhesghhmgidruggvpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhgihhtghgrug hgvghtsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i197146af:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 03:43:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 81c3b4fa (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Tue, 22 Apr 2025 07:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 09:43:18 +0200 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] mingw: do not use nedmalloc on Windows/ARM64 Message-ID: References: <6c2e17eca68b143eff7b33d195bc66a486471547.1745239150.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6c2e17eca68b143eff7b33d195bc66a486471547.1745239150.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com> On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 12:39:07PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote: > From: Johannes Schindelin > > It does not compile there, and seeing as nedmalloc has been pretty much > unmaintained since at least November 2017, as per > https://github.com/ned14/nedmalloc/issues/20#issuecomment-343432314, > there is also no hope that any fixes will materialize there. This kind of raises the question whether we want to keep on maintaining nedmalloc in our codebase at all. Is there any strong reason to have it? Patrick