From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bee.aspen.relay.mailchannels.net (bee.aspen.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.221.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81BCA28F1 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 07:08:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=23.83.221.14 ARC-Seal:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745392135; cv=pass; b=NNqQiZzPnhJ51wyk90zddSprXmNbpRV9uz9fLvgP3HaDtDkIJPCT6oPISQ/ZGoeQLbT+l9P2IEWorReQEYjr30pVRTYRsQnl1wFk+osLLYcDnl+XcAIRLgwazKQ04HwjNqIhnGlWSYy//ydcdD/nwHsMgO9a6zWr44DYzTH75hs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=2; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745392135; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XzuWSz+k+l76kumFfe8oWZKqBwVzSSTDStJKnREtm+0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ibGtKmzIQvisFVT+82/FxtMtXTGs6nAg83GN4SBVkrdmm8LmiHqTUygkWULEqQ4WqK0pS4A9TbQhlRmDPj4MqzbiU25brz1WjfcZiRzigwWHEUdQsUDqALuLiFj1QVGqZgpnodv97ddiAefB2FE5fDBCLklonnwL/4CN2tdHkn4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=2; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cryptonector.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cryptonector.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com header.i=@cryptonector.com header.b=RGw1V611; arc=pass smtp.client-ip=23.83.221.14 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=cryptonector.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cryptonector.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=cryptonector.com header.i=@cryptonector.com header.b="RGw1V611" X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D80844808; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 04:47:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a251.dreamhost.com (100-113-55-196.trex-nlb.outbound.svc.cluster.local [100.113.55.196]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 07A5C44EB7; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 04:47:14 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1745383634; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=3kKg+2Q5bIBbVE7LJA3ovBeRrfgJM8knKvyK64orB1o/cLF+XePS2p0KnGTJvY1pj1Tuvn j4+SffuHtJToX4OTL4TO3+zmOLCOOQL5ccJKgzPr7f02eYmSpONOcWOspncAyOh7AoDXS5 O/A6U+lsKVIlWAhC+qhQoz2G9ETOTVhHtXdkGkUZ0M/CD1dsI2NT7+IbvsxehICSQJCWfF LInnq3b8yOBgrkBaU6oPmxQnsX3/d4Yv6ReoSi+Kc88kDc0Q7yT1bALuORjm3HH1K0s7hO atkO9vAkWvC2h7LfwHq4HVrUNdiLcb2ZuKJXZsCzbeqI5lwODZt6GrD/gEun9Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1745383634; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=R8x/WuU24RjnbJd/U63k7afw2ymXk9UKTMMD1r/UiBA=; b=jKKhqEaM8EFQMS/UAzv+YsnEigGBtIXhnPoR0kB7HhTnrMflfirklVdaOYAlUVZIcizgWI i5hdMP8EGZz/NTOv89wLQLdSNGtPK3XzkVyI0Ht0iOW9+J6darAtlhVHOrc9qMh4bav3pF 4vafex2J9PlKzBsW9x9wKT2nvY4xil30OtDxDdA4Pti2UwVEbiKLtpSgy+qY44zq7eMy2C uc+HmAhsMmJIbl2z9s3pH7EBihFORw801wH8ePSj6gJumau/Gqkcs9HyIKXFQX2Dis4joj EtIvuV/Q5ay97hMlUGTBVQiMyvMFvsMMEDb51ZHM6NbSDG2rdR+oZBbrUBIQKg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-5cfcf5665-kj6cg; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=nico@cryptonector.com X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com X-MC-Relay: Bad X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|nico@cryptonector.com X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Well-Made-Gusty: 5461d76107e31352_1745383634292_4106831385 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1745383634292:3443649520 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1745383634292 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a251.dreamhost.com (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.113.55.196 (trex/7.0.3); Wed, 23 Apr 2025 04:47:14 +0000 Received: from ubby (syn-075-081-095-064.res.spectrum.com [75.81.95.64]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: nico@cryptonector.com) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a251.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Zj65r6fYSzBD; Tue, 22 Apr 2025 21:47:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cryptonector.com; s=dreamhost; t=1745383633; bh=R8x/WuU24RjnbJd/U63k7afw2ymXk9UKTMMD1r/UiBA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Content-Type; b=RGw1V611/jeU0xgjAA4PsyU7x0/RUSzYY6bXASfNZMFCnudIxzGFuereC4bQObQjo t7L3cBM5PeI+FYeQFWB4tAEMYa6ciCbopxTSkkFGnpuF8B/QOIKxa2tmFkodQ42aCe j+XZQAzGJzXIYhUoSGe/xp4Zgsf4fiJJ0vAzVoV2a1tyZSQI/FUhNGaoDxJih0VNWm QdITrx9UK1jKD3acTCCunAqW5DXILKLPiPlcc7tjxCRGu6gLqNLY5TEfKdlKbaS0/O sQTi+1VNY/TIYYsLWy0Up6pqex+12tBKSAKu1cLRJr4zZ2xKGm0hBKi4WrgJI5xG0L WjlqFjMt0VyMQ== Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:47:10 -0500 From: Nico Williams To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Remo Senekowitsch , "D. Ben Knoble" , Theodore Ts'o , Martin von Zweigbergk , Git Mailing List , Edwin Kempin , Scott Chacon , "philipmetzger@bluewin.ch" Subject: Re: Semantics of change IDs (Re: Gerrit, GitButler, and Jujutsu projects collaborating on change-id commit footer) Message-ID: References: <20250409121924.GA148735@mit.edu> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Apr 22, 2025 at 08:02:20PM -0500, Nico Williams wrote: > But remember that proponents want change IDs to not quite be unique, > since the point is that they tie multiple different versions of a commit > series together for the purpose of code review. In the end, when the > code review is completed and approved then the change ID might be unique > again, but then cherry-picking onto other branches for forward- or > back-porting might render them non-unique again. Ah, right, the thing about change IDs getting copied to new commits when cherry-picking was my suggestion. I stand by it, but it's not what others are proposing.