From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 907312701C0 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:30:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745407832; cv=none; b=tm3fAax+mnEFLak+FkOi8fGhAOK7lLI7wuggjfqsTvW1MrdfU75ISkj2EA1l6umwYW2LJhgM2ggEPzkLIwXkyHoE/GND3ndx9jmTjt2VTka5/c3GtBhTNedQ0iEdJUpYEu6uHsHNLmio91qDvYn4oReJceJzTaG8OKXr1uLVdxI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745407832; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZFgghDgh2GqCUu55T5HJtRhgD7IYCIwt6TMLnlAiuWE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CngITVJTohq3iWfbCU2WVzcqvP50U+PKKDBnYinaZvxdckpKaHEVvEyhQeitu/b5Grl4zdrGOK00hH+AeHJGjuTavpyZtXl+QK8PgypD/0rHBdXzeAgUJKqGnUZX5fQGkTaSjhvzxxuuB5KNb5SGDsK9ipllQqYOcVzXSI7gNkk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b=bopzfVos; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=NHGVN0Hu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b="bopzfVos"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="NHGVN0Hu" Received: from phl-compute-02.internal (phl-compute-02.phl.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6532F11402E2; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 07:30:29 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-02.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 23 Apr 2025 07:30:29 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pks.im; h=cc:cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1745407829; x=1745494229; bh=XmI3m1bXIF sDJtiyaborryq+a/ovF8Qn+ui83BzX9rU=; b=bopzfVosx7aQACwQbptPqBK5sG fuudA8WsKj/Vff+dgBP6U01wF4MDZxyEVZF3m6CuQ00qXbuwUR6mXQJgPsyGD6/j UyMPTUV0ZdsdGTy+j5RnW7VQqAZDRtya/5awnVrYO8vvvBrYkOY7KRKqzCJ9j1Lf dUjbeWfGl8sHS/MLra5Rhkl8aYYAqG3FHPFWsXaSjvydosLKufIdaM9b+mgtJhDD TC4EOgkFQGr3OyUB2t6W5BYzwZrky++n4gCEY6UE4m5k/GAsE04aLw7ZxrT74fDt 0K94/9YKwP/BjnLmsM9x9vTtDJSl/Bu7Noxb4f7hFq5VOyJbWzyY0vGgWKeQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1745407829; x=1745494229; bh=XmI3m1bXIFsDJtiyaborryq+a/ovF8Qn+ui 83BzX9rU=; b=NHGVN0HuONklbR7K/O0PVdNCnbuYKF+0EX07WOR/tHeUqahe/8D 6CKvEyuuR/MYN4PXxGv7ZS8qS7N8SGPuhPHGb/2CDSQnBzYW+Z8RsDjjpNa05Mzl EaG8OIJUKS3fZmt7x/+u+jRi0zBZs1iQZaUKvGE0Vti8Pdu5yYxeB2DtkaaPvPlq zt3HhNJIiqM49QeBLz+oXSoJOvJNAdI7fZNyYsd5pu9FURMNmsYv1vzZiTl9E8rR 3x+na8VQ2pe37urog0B4DPBUpLfyRPKGkOqgq59iwxnCg3q11XUOEsyOn++njdW7 p2aV5/aM9FNd7q+gaM3zOe78Bjnuunnbx3w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefvddrtddtgddvgeeigeekucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgfnhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggv pdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpih gvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtrodttddt vdenucfhrhhomheprfgrthhrihgtkhcuufhtvghinhhhrghrughtuceophhssehpkhhsrd himheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepjedttdegffekudejjeegudehgfehtdfgtdeiudel ueelgfeuteehledugeeuueevnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpe hmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhssehpkhhsrdhimhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohephedpmhhouggv pehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdprh gtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepkhgr rhhthhhikhdrudekkeesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehphhhilhhlihhprd ifohhougduvdefsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepthhoohhnsehiohhttghl rdgtohhm X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i197146af:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Wed, 23 Apr 2025 07:30:27 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 5dc43f03 (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Wed, 23 Apr 2025 11:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2025 13:30:24 +0200 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: Karthik Nayak Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, toon@iotcl.com, gitster@pobox.com, phillip.wood123@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 6/6] makefile/meson: add 'check-headers' as alias for 'hdr-check' Message-ID: References: <20250423-505-wire-up-sparse-via-meson-v5-0-d1e2be4b2078@gmail.com> <20250423-505-wire-up-sparse-via-meson-v5-6-d1e2be4b2078@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250423-505-wire-up-sparse-via-meson-v5-6-d1e2be4b2078@gmail.com> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 10:15:39AM +0200, Karthik Nayak wrote: > The 'hdr-check' target in Meson and makefile is used to check if headers > can be compiled individually. The naming however isn't readable as 'hdr' > is not a common shortforme for 'header', neither is it an abbreviation. > > Let's introduce 'check-headers' as an alternative target for 'hdr-check' > and add a `TODO` to deprecate the latter after 2 releases. Since this > is an internal tool, we can use a shorter deprecation cycle. > > Change existing usage of 'hdr-check' in 'ci/run-static-analysis.sh' to > also use 'check-headers'. I wondered whether we also want to rename `coccicheck` to `check-coccinelle` to match. But even if the answer would be "yes" I don't think that this change would need to be part of this patch series. Thanks! Patrick