From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: "brian m. carlson" <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Peter Seiderer <ps.report@gmx.net>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Eli Schwartz <eschwartz@gentoo.org>,
Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] meson: prefer POSIX-specified shell path
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2025 13:52:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aAt3Yc1NVZxsvSVX@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aAtopiMkJpF2RdjG@tapette.crustytoothpaste.net>
On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:49:10AM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote:
> On 2025-04-25 at 05:47:45, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > Meson detects the path of the target shell via `find_program("sh")`,
> > which essentially does a lookup via `PATH`. This may easily lead to a
> > subtly-broken Git distribution when the build host has its shell in a
> > non-standard location that the target host doesn't know about.
> >
> > Fix the issue by appending "/bin" to the custom program path, which
> > causes us to prefer "/bin/sh" over a `PATH` lookup. As this location is
> > specified by POSIX this should make us pick a better default shell path
> > on all POSIX-compliant systems.
>
> Can you provide a citation for that? I don't see that in the POSIX
> 1003.1-2024 directory structure document[0]. More specifically, I think
> there are some proprietary Unix systems where `/bin/sh` is the original
> Bourne shell and is not POSIX compliant and some other path is the
> POSIX-compliant `sh`.
Hrmpf, you're right. I feel like I relearn this piece of trivia every
couple years. POSIX is quite specific here:
Applications should note that the standard PATH to the shell cannot
be assumed to be either /bin/sh or /usr/bin/sh, and should be
determined by interrogation of the PATH returned by getconf PATH ,
ensuring that the returned pathname is an absolute pathname and not
a shell built-in.
Anyway, given the following...
> I'll also point out that we require more than POSIX compliance in that
> we require `local`, so even if `/bin/sh` is POSIX compliant, that
> doesn't mean that it's suitable for Git. `/bin/sh` meets our needs on
> all the Linux distros I'm aware of, plus the BSDs, but if it were AT&T
> ksh, that would not meet our needs since it doesn't support `local`,
> even though it's POSIX compliant.
... prefering "/bin/sh" is still the right thing to do as it tends to
work on most systems supported by us, even though it's non-POSIX. But in
any case, the commit message needs to be adjusted.
Thanks!
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-25 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-24 13:38 [PATCH 0/2] meson: prefer '/bin/sh' over PATH lookup Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-24 13:38 ` [PATCH 1/2] meson: report detected runtime executable paths Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 0:45 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-04-25 5:21 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 16:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-24 13:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] meson: prefer POSIX-specified shell path Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-24 20:18 ` Justin Tobler
2025-04-25 5:21 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-24 18:28 ` [PATCH 0/2] meson: prefer '/bin/sh' over PATH lookup Junio C Hamano
2025-04-25 5:21 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 5:47 ` [PATCH v2 " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 5:47 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] meson: report detected runtime executable paths Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 8:27 ` Toon Claes
2025-04-25 5:47 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] meson: prefer POSIX-specified shell path Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 8:35 ` Toon Claes
2025-04-25 10:49 ` brian m. carlson
2025-04-25 11:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-04-25 11:24 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] meson: prefer '/bin/sh' over PATH lookup Toon Claes
2025-04-25 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] meson: report detected runtime executable paths Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 14:11 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] meson: prefer shell at "/bin/sh" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-25 17:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-25 18:07 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-04-25 18:51 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-25 22:21 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-04-25 20:10 ` brian m. carlson
2025-04-25 22:25 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-04-25 20:13 ` brian m. carlson
2025-05-02 21:16 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] meson: prefer '/bin/sh' over PATH lookup Junio C Hamano
2025-05-02 22:37 ` Eli Schwartz
2025-05-05 6:08 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aAt3Yc1NVZxsvSVX@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=eschwartz@gentoo.org \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
--cc=ps.report@gmx.net \
--cc=sandals@crustytoothpaste.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).