From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Kristoffer Haugsbakk <code@khaugsbakk.name>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ci(win+Meson): build in Release mode
Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 11:43:25 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBiIPe7EVTBxENUp@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e2fdccc-2c52-805f-ff9c-b9e0e72614ac@gmx.de>
On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 09:27:10AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Mon, 5 May 2025, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
>
> > On Sat, May 03, 2025 at 02:25:46PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget wrote:
> > > From: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
> > > Changes since v1:
> > >
> > > * Rewrote the commit message to reflect that this patch is still
> > > needed, even if the symptom that originally motivated the patch was
> > > addressed in a different manner, because it was merely a symptom of
> > > the underlying root cause that CI builds should not let Visual C
> > > build Git in debug mode.
> >
> > Ok, makes sense. I think we should ideally address this issue
> > strategically, e.g. by getting rid of asserts completely in our
> > codebase. But for now I agree that we should just build Git in release
> > mode on Windows.
>
> I am afraid that getting rid of asserts in Git's codebase won't ever be
> able to address the challenge that Git -- despite much reluctance --
> relies on a couple of external dependencies that might at any point in
> time cause `assert()` to be called, e.g. due to unexpected changes in the
> CI runner images.
Good point indeed, I haven't considered this.
> In essence, we will need both: CI builds in release mode _and_ converting
> `assert()`s to `BUG()` calls (the latter, however, for different reasons
> than to proactively address CI hangs: Git can convey better information in
> `BUG()` calls than in `assert()` calls).
>
> There are more reasons to use release mode builds in CI, too, but we
> already have a compelling reason to do so, therefore there is no need for
> me to spend more time assembling an exhaustive list.
Yup.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-05 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-25 15:05 [PATCH] ci(win+Meson): build in Release mode, avoiding t7001-mv hangs Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-04-25 15:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-28 7:47 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-28 17:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-29 12:20 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 20:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-04-30 8:58 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-30 12:46 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 20:57 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-05-03 14:25 ` [PATCH v2] ci(win+Meson): build in Release mode Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget
2025-05-05 6:06 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 7:27 ` Johannes Schindelin
2025-05-05 9:43 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-05-05 15:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-06 7:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-06 8:32 ` Johannes Schindelin
2025-05-08 18:19 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBiIPe7EVTBxENUp@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=code@khaugsbakk.name \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).