From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: Seyi Chamber <kuforiji98@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable block test to use clar
Date: Tue, 6 May 2025 07:10:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBmZtFlcn8CunVg_@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq7c2uoj40.fsf@gitster.g>
On Mon, May 05, 2025 at 02:14:39PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
>
> > -M[<n>], --find-renames[=<n>]
> > Detect renames. If <n> is specified, it is a threshold on the similarity index (i.e. amount
> > of addition/deletions compared to the file’s size). For example, -M90% means Git should
> > consider a delete/add pair to be a rename if more than 90% of the file hasn’t changed.
> > Without a % sign, the number is to be read as a fraction, with a decimal point before it.
> > I.e., -M5 becomes 0.5, and is thus the same as -M50%. Similarly, -M05 is the same as -M5%.
> > To limit detection to exact renames, use -M100%. The default similarity index is 50%.
> >
> > What you probably wanted to say is `--find-renames=90%`, but without the
> > percentage sign it is read as a fraction, where 1 means "exact copy" and
> > 0 means "all different".
>
> I am confused. -M<number> without trailing %-sign is taken as
> fraction against 1 followed by the same number of '0' has the
> <number> has digits. -M5 is 5 over 10, -M50 is 50 over 100. -M90
> is 90 over 100, so -M90 and -M90% should mean the same thing.
Hm, I guess _I_ was confused then. It doesn't feel natural to me that
-M90 would mean 90% whereas -M5 means 50%, and the documentation isn't
quite clear about this, either.
> But you are right. When you want to claim your pre- and post- image
> files still correspond with each other in a meaningful way, even
> after making extensive change, you would want to _lower_, not raise,
> your similarity threshold. If the default is -M50, then -M90 would
> be a useful option to reject what Git (mistakenly) thinks are renames
> and tell it to instead consider they are removals and creations.
Yeah, at least that point stands :)
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-06 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 17:52 [PATCH v2 00/10] t/unit-tests: convert unit-tests to use clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] t/unit-tests: implement reftable test helper functions in unit-test.{c,h} Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 23:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable basics test to use clar test framework Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable block test to use clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 7:37 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-05 9:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 21:14 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-05-06 5:10 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable merged " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable pq " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable reader " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable readwrite " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable record " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-04-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] t/unit-tests: convert reftable stack " Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 9:11 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-05 9:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-04-29 17:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] t/unit-tests: adapt lib-reftable{c,h} helper functions to clar Seyi Kuforiji
2025-05-02 9:57 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-05 7:27 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-05 9:52 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-05-26 9:04 ` Seyi Chamber
2025-05-26 12:56 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBmZtFlcn8CunVg_@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=kuforiji98@gmail.com \
--cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).