public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oswald Buddenhagen <oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de>
To: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>,
	Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>,
	Kristoffer Haugsbakk <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>,
	Phillip Wood <phillip.wood123@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] commit: print advice when core.commentString=auto
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2025 17:18:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aIzayan9nFZo4XYv@ugly> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0e7c08b15e5923ae03f5630a8286c7dcebdbcfb9.1753975294.git.phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk>

On Thu, Jul 31, 2025 at 04:21:55PM +0100, Phillip Wood wrote:
>An alternative
>approach would be to advise the user to run "git config --show-origin"
>and leave them to figure out how to fix it themselves but that seems
>rather unfriendly. As we're forcing them to update their config we
>should try and make that as easy as possible.
>
your approach certainly helps the user to fix their acute problem 
quickly, but
- why should it? it's not like leaving it to the user would cause them a 
   huge burden, or that a noteworthy number of users are even going to be 
   affected. i don't think the fact that the update is forced justifies 
   making it a lot more user friendly than git configuration usually is, 
   esp. at this cost in complexity.
- i don't think i'd appreciate the tool lecturing me about trivial usage 
   patterns, when the real question in that situation is why the option 
   was set like that in the first place and whether/how the replacement 
   is actually equivalent or even superior.
- given that it doesn't print the entire decision tree (when 
   encountering read-only files), it doesn't necessarily guide the user 
   towards the best overall solution. that makes it _less_ user-friendly, 
   in a way.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-08-01 15:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-08 13:56 [PATCH 0/2] breaking-changes: deprecate support for core.commentChar=auto Phillip Wood
2025-07-08 13:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] breaking-changes: deprecate support for core.commentString=auto Phillip Wood
2025-07-08 15:28   ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-09  9:40     ` Phillip Wood
2025-07-08 13:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] commit: print advice when core.commentString=auto Phillip Wood
2025-07-08 18:51 ` [PATCH 0/2] breaking-changes: deprecate support for core.commentChar=auto Junio C Hamano
2025-07-09  9:38   ` Phillip Wood
2025-07-09 16:20     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-11 15:09       ` Phillip Wood
2025-07-11 17:07         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-12  8:01           ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2025-07-12 14:06             ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-26 23:15         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-27 15:46           ` Phillip Wood
2025-07-09  1:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-09  1:52   ` Ayush Chandekar
2025-07-09  9:38   ` Phillip Wood
2025-07-31 15:21 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] " Phillip Wood
2025-07-31 15:21   ` [PATCH v2 1/3] breaking-changes: deprecate support for core.commentString=auto Phillip Wood
2025-07-31 20:49     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-07-31 15:21   ` [PATCH v2 2/3] config: warn on core.commentString=auto Phillip Wood
2025-07-31 21:17     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-01 10:37       ` Phillip Wood
2025-08-01 14:36     ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2025-07-31 15:21   ` [PATCH v2 3/3] commit: print advice when core.commentString=auto Phillip Wood
2025-08-01 15:18     ` Oswald Buddenhagen [this message]
2025-08-01 17:19       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-26 13:33       ` Phillip Wood
2025-08-27  8:19         ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2025-08-27 16:39           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-27 22:38             ` Oswald Buddenhagen
2025-08-01  3:50   ` [PATCH v2 0/3] breaking-changes: deprecate support for core.commentChar=auto Junio C Hamano
2025-08-01 10:36     ` Phillip Wood
2025-08-01 16:41       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-26 13:35 ` [PATCH v3 " Phillip Wood
2025-08-26 13:35   ` [PATCH v3 1/3] breaking-changes: deprecate support for core.commentString=auto Phillip Wood
2025-08-26 13:35   ` [PATCH v3 2/3] config: warn on core.commentString=auto Phillip Wood
2025-08-26 15:52     ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-27 15:29       ` Phillip Wood
2025-08-27 18:55         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-26 13:35   ` [PATCH v3 3/3] commit: print advice when core.commentString=auto Phillip Wood
2025-08-27 15:27 ` [PATCH v4 0/3] breaking-changes: deprecate support for core.commentChar=auto Phillip Wood
2025-08-27 15:27   ` [PATCH v4 1/3] breaking-changes: deprecate support for core.commentString=auto Phillip Wood
2025-08-27 15:27   ` [PATCH v4 2/3] config: warn on core.commentString=auto Phillip Wood
2025-08-27 15:27   ` [PATCH v4 3/3] commit: print advice when core.commentString=auto Phillip Wood

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aIzayan9nFZo4XYv@ugly \
    --to=oswald.buddenhagen@gmx.de \
    --cc=ayu.chandekar@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
    --cc=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood123@gmail.com \
    --cc=phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox