From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at>
Cc: "R. Diez" <rdiez-2006@rd10.de>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Graphical tool to merge and reorder commits
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:05:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKRaiaym7KsJ2Ojg@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <260a97ce-2ab0-4920-9cea-078369c42f74@petrovitsch.priv.at>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 11:51:42AM +0200, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
> On 19.08.25 10:35, R. Diez wrote:
> [...]
> > I guess some "git history squash" command would be useful too.
> >
> > This is what frequently happens to me:
> > - I commit some code changes because the current project builds and tests fine.
> > - I start the "compile all projects" process, which takes about 1 hour.
> > - In the meantime, I commit other unrelated changes.
> > - After an hour, I realise that a silly mistake in the first commit makes compilation fail for some project.
> > I fix that and I trigger a "compile all projects" again, which takes 1 hour again.
> > - In the meantime, I commit yet another unrelated change.
> > - After yet another hour, the build process notifies me that I made yet another little mistake, and yet another project fails now.
> >
> > The commit history looks like this:
> >
> > - A - B - fixA1 - C - fixA2 - D - E
> >
> > I only do a "git push" when the 1-hour compilation process succeeds. Before the "git push", I want to reorganise that into:
> >
> > - A+fixA1+fixA2 - B - C - D - E
> >
> > I know I can work with branches, but branches make everything more complicated. A linear history is easier, especially when you are working alone. Besides, it is not often that I make such silly mistakes. ;-)
>
> - `git rebase -i HEAD~11` (or so;-)
> - move fixA1 and fixA2 under A and change "pick" to "fixup" for fixA1 and fixA2
> - save and exit the editor
>
> And done.
It's not really that this isn't doable. It's just not all that obvious
for people who aren't experts, and it's not a straight-forward thing to
do. I think the Git project could certainly use better tooling to make
common workflows obvious and easy.
Anyway, the patch series is out now and can be found at [1].
Patrick
[1]: https://lore.kernel.org/git/20250819-b4-pks-history-builtin-v1-0-9b77c32688fe@pks.im/T/#t
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-19 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-17 21:02 Graphical tool to merge and reorder commits R. Diez
2025-08-18 18:04 ` Konstantin Khomoutov
2025-08-18 18:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-19 8:07 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-08-19 8:35 ` R. Diez
2025-08-19 9:51 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2025-08-19 11:05 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-08-19 11:14 ` R. Diez
2025-08-19 12:08 ` Ben Knoble
2025-08-19 16:33 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-19 19:09 ` Johannes Sixt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKRaiaym7KsJ2Ojg@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=bernd@petrovitsch.priv.at \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=rdiez-2006@rd10.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).