From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] meson: wire up gitk and git-gui
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2025 19:25:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aKtLCAq9Y-59cIbc@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqq7byzfh0w.fsf@gitster.g>
On Tue, Aug 19, 2025 at 08:49:35AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> Having said that, I somehow feel that ...
>
> > {git-gui => subprojects/git-gui}/.gitattributes | 0
> > ...
> > {gitk-git => subprojects/gitk}/.gitignore | 0
>
> ... a move like this is bending the source to match the limitation
> of the tool, making the people who use (write, read, and build from)
> the source to pay for the price, which is backwards. The tool, be
> it Meson or Make or CMake, should be serving the project, not the
> other way around. In our current build system, we don't have to
> have borrowed code (from gitk, git-gui, sha1dc, or xdiff) inside a
> specific subdirectory.
>
> But I may change my mind while reading the real patches, not the
> diffstat.
I'm not much of a fan of these changes either, and agree that this is a
limitation of the tool. I think it isn't _too_ bad, but I would've
preferred to not require this step.
If this is proving to be a blocker we can also change upstream to not be
a separate project. That'd have the downside that it cannot be used
standalone, but the upside that we can just put these directories
wherever we want and then include them via `subdir()`.
I think taking the pain once though and renaming is preferred so that
both gitk and git-gui can also be used with Meson standalone.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-24 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-08-19 8:18 [PATCH 0/3] meson: wire up gitk and git-gui Patrick Steinhardt
2025-08-19 8:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] git-gui: move into "subprojects/" Patrick Steinhardt
2025-08-19 9:36 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-08-19 8:18 ` [PATCH 2/3] gitk: " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-08-20 5:49 ` [PATCH] doc/gitk: update reference to the external project Johannes Sixt
2025-08-20 6:16 ` [PATCH v2] " Johannes Sixt
2025-08-20 15:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-08-19 8:18 ` [PATCH 3/3] meson: wire up gitk and git-gui Patrick Steinhardt
2025-08-19 9:40 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-08-24 17:25 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-08-19 15:49 ` [PATCH 0/3] " Junio C Hamano
2025-08-24 17:25 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-08-26 0:40 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-02 13:00 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-08-19 22:25 ` Ramsay Jones
2025-08-24 17:25 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aKtLCAq9Y-59cIbc@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=j6t@kdbg.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).