From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] odb: move commit-graph into the object sources
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 19:00:27 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aMNUi9+MZd0rtmOT@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250904-b4-pks-commit-graph-via-source-v1-6-d932c2481e1a@pks.im>
On Thu, Sep 04, 2025 at 02:50:00PM +0200, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> Commit graphs are inherently tied to one specific object source.
> Furthermore, with the upcoming pluggable object sources, it is not even
> guaranteed that an object source may even have a commit graph as these
> are specific to the actual on-disk data format.
>
> Prepare for this future by moving the commit-graph pointer from `struct
> object_database` to `struct odb_source`. Eventually, this will allow us
> to make commit graphs an implementation detail of an object source's
> backend.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
> ---
> commit-graph.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
> commit-graph.h | 2 +-
> odb.c | 9 ++++----
> odb.h | 6 +++---
> packfile.c | 3 +--
> 5 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/commit-graph.c b/commit-graph.c
> index 0e25b14076..9929c1ed87 100644
> --- a/commit-graph.c
> +++ b/commit-graph.c
> @@ -721,11 +721,15 @@ static struct commit_graph *load_commit_graph_chain(struct odb_source *source)
>
> struct commit_graph *read_commit_graph_one(struct odb_source *source)
> {
> - struct commit_graph *g = load_commit_graph_v1(source);
> + struct commit_graph *g;
> +
> + if (source->commit_graph_attempted)
> + return NULL;
I wonder if some callers will find this surprising. The current analog
of this function is commit-graph.c::prepare_commit_graph(), which does:
if (r->objects->commit_graph_attempted)
return r->objects->commit_graph;
, but this function returns NULL on the second (and subsequent) calls,
even if the object source in question has a commit graph that was loaded
in an earlier step.
> + source->commit_graph_attempted = true;
>
> + g = load_commit_graph_v1(source);
> if (!g)
> g = load_commit_graph_chain(source);
> -
> return g;
> }
>
> @@ -737,6 +741,7 @@ struct commit_graph *read_commit_graph_one(struct odb_source *source)
> */
> static struct commit_graph *prepare_commit_graph(struct repository *r)
> {
> + bool all_attempted = true;
> struct odb_source *source;
>
> /*
> @@ -749,9 +754,19 @@ static struct commit_graph *prepare_commit_graph(struct repository *r)
> if (!r->gitdir || r->commit_graph_disabled)
> return NULL;
>
> - if (r->objects->commit_graph_attempted)
> - return r->objects->commit_graph;
> - r->objects->commit_graph_attempted = 1;
> + odb_prepare_alternates(r->objects);
> + for (source = r->objects->sources; source; source = source->next) {
> + all_attempted &= source->commit_graph_attempted;
> + if (source->commit_graph)
> + return source->commit_graph;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * There is no point in re-trying to load commit graphs if we already
> + * tried loading all of them beforehand.
> + */
> + if (all_attempted)
> + return NULL;
>
> prepare_repo_settings(r);
>
> @@ -768,14 +783,16 @@ static struct commit_graph *prepare_commit_graph(struct repository *r)
> if (!commit_graph_compatible(r))
> return NULL;
>
> - odb_prepare_alternates(r->objects);
> for (source = r->objects->sources; source; source = source->next) {
> - r->objects->commit_graph = read_commit_graph_one(source);
> - if (r->objects->commit_graph)
> - break;
> + if (source->commit_graph_attempted)
> + continue;
> +
> + source->commit_graph = read_commit_graph_one(source);
> + if (source->commit_graph)
> + return source->commit_graph;
Is this what callers expect? The pre-image here returned the
commit-graph belonging to the current repository's object database, not
any of its alternate(s).
I'm not opposed to the idea that perhaps loading commit-graphs from
alternates would be useful, but I am uncomfortable making that change in
this series.
Thanks,
Taylor
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-11 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-04 12:49 [PATCH 0/6] odb: track commit graphs via object source Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 1/6] blame: drop explicit check for commit graph Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 22:09 ` Taylor Blau
2025-09-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 2/6] revision: " Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 22:16 ` Taylor Blau
2025-09-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 3/6] commit-graph: return the prepared commit graph from `prepare_commit_graph()` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 22:25 ` Taylor Blau
2025-09-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 4/6] commit-graph: return commit graph from `repo_find_commit_pos_in_graph()` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 22:54 ` Taylor Blau
2025-09-04 12:49 ` [PATCH 5/6] commit-graph: pass graphs that are to be merged as parameter Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-04 12:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] odb: move commit-graph into the object sources Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-11 23:00 ` Taylor Blau [this message]
2025-09-04 23:12 ` [PATCH 0/6] odb: track commit graphs via object source Junio C Hamano
2025-09-05 18:29 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-09-08 11:17 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-08 14:46 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-09-10 11:38 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-09-25 19:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-26 5:18 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-02 11:21 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-02 11:35 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-02 16:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-03 16:56 ` Derrick Stolee
2025-09-11 23:08 ` Taylor Blau
2025-09-04 23:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-09-05 6:18 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aMNUi9+MZd0rtmOT@nand.local \
--to=me@ttaylorr.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ps@pks.im \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).