From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a1-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C5DD2D77E4 for ; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 10:54:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.144 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757933645; cv=none; b=I9PB72LUi6c8cPujUdYzi19YwVm6hiGhe49ixjlipLSrs+8ZXpSMXaV9mfo0H5/C7LjYSYgBRiHaqSN7X9DjdxFZvCfzihvxsZOsm0Sx51eSRnUB/puk4TXka5OfjCFxhsVLwGoyNpNxuObGWwGA8/a4lpgZSS982vgqAVF3sQM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1757933645; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pqbUEnidkWOl5FP0PFEhPmk15RLaw8OYde0vI/ko6xw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=P4fy6Ihy1RvtPLToLX9X3DyJTg1qPW+NM3dcGcAcgzScFd5jNrdhlet+H+PWrh4vYJMLMowsgfrIppvQlzpZWLS+MtzDVxcOQ05xKoTmO68bZryzifq2ZuuXhFHNN0/T9TYuJLhLks4sHBBbdYxqNlB0QEyYhqgWz4e9Hqzb2hA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b=TG9YUA2c; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=cEHuAkmN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.144 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b="TG9YUA2c"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="cEHuAkmN" Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61230EC0283; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 06:54:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 15 Sep 2025 06:54:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pks.im; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm1; t=1757933643; x=1758020043; bh=UOKptnWt4n XUX8BV/xga2eRNGeNaeHQe9mR0gmIm9i8=; b=TG9YUA2cSjMR48L2J8tWqZExyU op6hAVBmUH93hf/4LyUgp0eHkv9Xg2SHmS2ajsYW7NJ+09ckESZKzxliw8Oji1mg 7eDQBe6uc2XNJaBCcQZTP2MunVobHfBoBcboMeoHMLQIBrfR3gnukofDzyTN0oSO 8tOU/0ahRL/3Bn4IkquKNn7iEqerW4Hy/KbcrUkbfug6TXwVGFFZmacTCrdg1I9H 5VDgQ/2LGacgPyTxlsb7jbSrCC3TsBjYrRGCnaNBk9cS8gnU+CbpoWoA2goYqYGC YE3WSs3VAMgwxw2qX10+8M/DUo6yuh7nVgySkNMjyKGmaxmYJInb9UDjdqIg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; t= 1757933643; x=1758020043; bh=UOKptnWt4nXUX8BV/xga2eRNGeNaeHQe9mR 0gmIm9i8=; b=cEHuAkmNSoq9iIc8ZXqWSENa/PJ22tei8l+ysr7fUS1vnY5nWyk KiOohhcmLgBeOEpX1Qtl6bwQCX33LBExdOUR5VFjgpzPADECYRUqPiDQg4aQ97I+ zM+KUaqYVvT3gVNKqUe/fzofOG4ISAYwmcsHrxQe+l/vfz1Ix6CEpD+TcgHXVnkP 02Pt86xlW7sYwBcGX943YuP1tIducTof0fj/GPnlztb0AZK742TUqp1yG90qzo6V Gk4bVi1xeFNc3nxi7rMUoFw0SFT7QUM6s44zGPLpE30mRm3l3OQKkzp8GDr4AUdY ZRJN/YvIMHRWB4etMaWcdkhMRAaikYJVwkg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggdefjeehtdcutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecuuegr ihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjug hrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgrthhrihgtkhcu ufhtvghinhhhrghrughtuceophhssehpkhhsrdhimheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhephe ekfeefgeegvdegvdeffeehtedttdffjeeuffelgffgheefleffleejvdefheeinecuvehl uhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhssehpkhhsrd himhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepudehpdhmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthdprhgtphhtthho pehnvgifrhgvnhesghhmrghilhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegvshgthhifrghrthiise hgvghnthhoohdrohhrghdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhnvghlrdho rhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheptgholhhlihhnrdhfuhhnkhdusehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtg hpthhtohepsggvnhdrkhhnohgslhgvsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepshgr mhesghgvnhhtohhordhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtg homhdprhgtphhtthhopegviigvkhhivghlnhgvfihrvghnsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhr tghpthhtohepphhhihhllhhiphdrfihoohguuddvfeesghhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i197146af:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 15 Sep 2025 06:54:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6ec1fdab (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Mon, 15 Sep 2025 10:54:00 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 12:53:56 +0200 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: "brian m. carlson" , git@vger.kernel.org, "Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier" , Ben Knoble , Christian Brabandt , Collin Funk , Eli Schwartz , Elijah Newren , Ezekiel Newren , Johannes Schindelin , Junio C Hamano , Phillip Wood , Pierre-Emmanuel Patry , Sam James , Taylor Blau Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v4 0/9] Introduce Rust and announce that it will become mandatory Message-ID: References: <20250904-b4-pks-rust-breaking-change-v1-0-3af1d25e0be9@pks.im> <20250910-b4-pks-rust-breaking-change-v4-0-4a63fc69278d@pks.im> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 09:55:54PM +0000, brian m. carlson wrote: > I may end up sending in a patch or two for these if I have some time. Sure! No pressure here, us being able to iterate is why I wanted to make things opt-in in the first release. > I did note the discussion about what the LTS process looks like, which I > don't have strong opinions about but do want to make sure the project > (including folks on the security list) is willing to support. Other > than that, this series looked reasonable to me. I also confirmed that > it works with my existing sha256-interop-part-2 series, which I > appreciate. That's awesome, thanks for confirming. > I think once we have agreement on the LTS process, this should be good > to go. Yay! In any case, I would be okay to help out with the LTS process as long as it's still owned by the Git project. Patrick