From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Han Young <hanyang.tony@bytedance.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org, Han Young <hanyoung@protonmail.com>,
Sigma <git@sigma-star.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] files-backend: check symref name before update
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 13:47:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aN5mOTbGBcr355E6@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOLa=ZTnHQbg9ocdA1omqER6CJH-w30G14-F2JAQMtueXENWew@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 02:54:54AM -0700, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
> > Han Young <hanyang.tony@bytedance.com> writes:
> >
> >> From: Han Young <hanyoung@protonmail.com>
> >>
> >> In the ref files backend, the symbolic reference name is not checked
> >> before an update. This could cause reference and lock files to be created
> >> outside the refs/ directory. Validate the reference before adding it to
> >> the ref update transaction.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Sigma <git@sigma-star.io>
> >> Signed-off-by: Han Young <hanyoung@protonmail.com>
> >> ---
> >> refs/files-backend.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/refs/files-backend.c b/refs/files-backend.c
> >> index bc3347d18..d47a8c392 100644
> >> --- a/refs/files-backend.c
> >> +++ b/refs/files-backend.c
> >> @@ -2516,6 +2516,16 @@ static enum ref_transaction_error split_symref_update(struct ref_update *update,
> >> struct ref_update *new_update;
> >> unsigned int new_flags;
> >>
> >> + /*
> >> + * Check the referent is valid before adding it to the transaction.
> >> + */
> >> + if (!refname_is_safe(referent)) {
> >
> > Shouldn't this new condition share the logic with what is done by
> > fsck? IOW, after doing this
> >
> > $ echo ref: refs/../HEAD > .git/HEAD
> >
> > "git fsck" or "git refs verify" should barf (if not, we should make
> > them barf), and this code should use the same logic to notice that
> > the target of the symbolic ref is bogus.
> >
>
> Good point. I see that 'git fsck' does complain about this:
>
> $ git fsck
> Checking ref database: 100% (1/1), done.
> Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done.
> error: invalid HEAD
> dangling commit ccd1771e44a18887197d3ee26ca37c2e892b9fb6
> dangling commit f99d68ea2c378218e2360dee4e24115c404f6a66
>
> However 'git refs verify' doesn't...
>
> $ git refs verify --verbose
> Checking references consistency
> Checking refs/heads/master
> Checking packed-refs file .git/packed-refs
>
> Okay, so this seems like because fsck also parses all references to mark
> reachability and also parses 'HEAD' via `refs_resolve_ref_unsafe()`
> which fails.
>
> This symref checks and checking root refs is definitely something we
> should consider adding to 'git refs verify'.
Agreed! Overall, the goal is that all logic to verify references should
be contained in `git refs verify`, so that git-fsck(1) only needs to
shell out to that command to perform the full check.
So if this logic isn't yet part of `git refs verify`, we should migrate
it over.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-02 11:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-01 15:08 [PATCH 0/1] files-backend: check symref name before update Han Young
2025-10-01 15:08 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Han Young
2025-10-01 19:22 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-02 9:54 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-02 11:47 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-10-02 13:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-02 15:30 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-02 17:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-05 8:19 ` shejialuo
2025-10-02 9:34 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Karthik Nayak
2025-10-02 14:45 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aN5mOTbGBcr355E6@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@sigma-star.io \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=hanyang.tony@bytedance.com \
--cc=hanyoung@protonmail.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).