git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
	Han Young <hanyang.tony@bytedance.com>,
	git@vger.kernel.org, Han Young <hanyoung@protonmail.com>,
	Sigma <git@sigma-star.io>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] files-backend: check symref name before update
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 13:47:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aN5mOTbGBcr355E6@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOLa=ZTnHQbg9ocdA1omqER6CJH-w30G14-F2JAQMtueXENWew@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 02:54:54AM -0700, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> 
> > Han Young <hanyang.tony@bytedance.com> writes:
> >
> >> From: Han Young <hanyoung@protonmail.com>
> >>
> >> In the ref files backend, the symbolic reference name is not checked
> >> before an update. This could cause reference and lock files to be created
> >> outside the refs/ directory. Validate the reference before adding it to
> >> the ref update transaction.
> >>
> >> Reported-by: Sigma <git@sigma-star.io>
> >> Signed-off-by: Han Young <hanyoung@protonmail.com>
> >> ---
> >>  refs/files-backend.c | 10 ++++++++++
> >>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/refs/files-backend.c b/refs/files-backend.c
> >> index bc3347d18..d47a8c392 100644
> >> --- a/refs/files-backend.c
> >> +++ b/refs/files-backend.c
> >> @@ -2516,6 +2516,16 @@ static enum ref_transaction_error split_symref_update(struct ref_update *update,
> >>  	struct ref_update *new_update;
> >>  	unsigned int new_flags;
> >>
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * Check the referent is valid before adding it to the transaction.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	if (!refname_is_safe(referent)) {
> >
> > Shouldn't this new condition share the logic with what is done by
> > fsck?  IOW, after doing this
> >
> >   $ echo ref: refs/../HEAD > .git/HEAD
> >
> > "git fsck" or "git refs verify" should barf (if not, we should make
> > them barf), and this code should use the same logic to notice that
> > the target of the symbolic ref is bogus.
> >
> 
> Good point. I see that 'git fsck' does complain about this:
> 
>   $ git fsck
>   Checking ref database: 100% (1/1), done.
>   Checking object directories: 100% (256/256), done.
>   error: invalid HEAD
>   dangling commit ccd1771e44a18887197d3ee26ca37c2e892b9fb6
>   dangling commit f99d68ea2c378218e2360dee4e24115c404f6a66
> 
> However 'git refs verify' doesn't...
> 
>   $ git refs verify --verbose
>   Checking references consistency
>   Checking refs/heads/master
>   Checking packed-refs file .git/packed-refs
> 
> Okay, so this seems like because fsck also parses all references to mark
> reachability and also parses 'HEAD' via `refs_resolve_ref_unsafe()`
> which fails.
> 
> This symref checks and checking root refs is definitely something we
> should consider adding to 'git refs verify'.

Agreed! Overall, the goal is that all logic to verify references should
be contained in `git refs verify`, so that git-fsck(1) only needs to
shell out to that command to perform the full check.

So if this logic isn't yet part of `git refs verify`, we should migrate
it over.

Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-02 11:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-01 15:08 [PATCH 0/1] files-backend: check symref name before update Han Young
2025-10-01 15:08 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Han Young
2025-10-01 19:22   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-02  9:54     ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-02 11:47       ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-10-02 13:36         ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-02 15:30           ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-02 17:34             ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-05  8:19         ` shejialuo
2025-10-02  9:34 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Karthik Nayak
2025-10-02 14:45   ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aN5mOTbGBcr355E6@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=git@sigma-star.io \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=hanyang.tony@bytedance.com \
    --cc=hanyoung@protonmail.com \
    --cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).