Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] Introduce rust: In xdiff

[Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>]

On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 03:48:04PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> writes:
> 
> > So, how to move forward?
> >
> > A) Modify Patrick's series to just take patch 7 of his v5.  Patrick
> > did say that the roadmap was  "the more important discussion compared
> > to the technical discussion", and merging that patch would achieve his
> > goal of getting an initial roadmap.  Then Ezekiel could grab other
> > pieces from Patrick's series (e.g. the help and varint stuff) and
> > incorporate it into an "introduce rust" series.[*]
> >
> > B) Merge Patrick's series and tell Ezekiel to rebase, while noting to
> > Ezekiel that the roadmap is the important bit from Patrick's series[*]
> > and he can suggest changes to any of the other bits.
> >
> > C) Create a consolidated "introduce Rust" series with bits of both --
> > what I think Ezekiel was trying to do with this series.
> 
> Ah, I didn't even realize C was what this series was trying to do.
> 
> I do not have particular preference between A and B, but I thought A
> was closer to what was being done with this series, and as long as
> Ezekiel and Patrick can join forces that way, it would be perfect.

I personally think either (A) or (B) would be good choices. I would
slightly lean towards (B) just so that we have something that we can
already play around with while building the next steps.

By the way: I'm also happy to change attribution of some of the patches
in my patch series to mention Ezekiel as author. I don't care much who
is listed for the initial patches that introduce Rust, but would retain
my own authorship for the "varint" and "BreakingChanges" commits.

Patrick