git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc] flip rerere.enabled default to be "on" at Git 3.0 boundary?
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 15:45:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aPfi3JuQsDS9mpN0@nand.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqldl4und1.fsf@gitster.g>

On Tue, Oct 21, 2025 at 11:21:46AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> A good default matters, and people who find out how useful a rerere
> database is would say "gee, that sounds great but why they do not
> enable it by default?  It is too buggy and they wanted to reduce the
> number of support requests?"  Yes, the reason it is not enabled by
> default initially was exactly that, i.e. those opt into the feature
> was used as guinea pigs to polish the feature.  But we forgot to set
> the graduation criteria and never said "ok it is mature enough, so
> let's turn it on for everybody".
>
> Perhaps Git 3.0 boundary is a good occasion to do so?

Perhaps, but I wonder if waiting until Git 3.0 is necessary. I use the
rerere cache daily and have for years, so I consider this battle-tested
at least in my own workflow.

I'm not saying we should *necessarily* do this, but I wonder for
argument's sake: what would prevent us from changing the default for
2.52?

Thanks,
Taylor

      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-21 19:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-21 18:21 [rfc] flip rerere.enabled default to be "on" at Git 3.0 boundary? Junio C Hamano
2025-10-21 18:55 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2025-10-21 21:36   ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-10-21 21:37     ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-10-21 22:19   ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-22  5:55   ` Johannes Sixt
2025-10-22 17:45     ` Ben Knoble
2025-10-22 18:54       ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-23 19:19         ` D. Ben Knoble
2025-10-23 19:44           ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-23 22:03             ` Ben Knoble
2025-10-21 19:45 ` Taylor Blau [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aPfi3JuQsDS9mpN0@nand.local \
    --to=me@ttaylorr.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).