From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com (fout-a5-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C844E22370D for ; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 06:36:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.148 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761287799; cv=none; b=dFbgnGjMiNd75ahPkBVNKSTOwPVQaSV0/QD7hCmeg8nau3F6NmCEmVUwbq4gX+OYPDmDVJ4KS6Pel6KeQovPhpQUrOeCKCJ5R+w5kGUknHhurk+sFaDL0h8j3ZPuikisADbzJ6f5vIy/afAFUN8nW69lomKKH0OhtqRD4kvd9A0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761287799; c=relaxed/simple; bh=8ny7HcVpj05P8b/OydgM/RhHe5o9UgCxnK34zqi23qY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=de8szlwTMm+3tebWjg4DroA52dK6c294qgIrP8t0BaRuiO8P/obGv5VpliKiOK8rC4BVJpTEzhrwluKDm3CD9YRu/a7+SO8/W/Rz8e4gA+nckxO1Kav6dIITgxdqg47ObtohuU91ZjwcCscPWibEvgQQeQnY+T6p5irWM9j4mjM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b=bLYq2EGb; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=ycYYJ4+m; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.148 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b="bLYq2EGb"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="ycYYJ4+m" Received: from phl-compute-03.internal (phl-compute-03.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailfout.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id D883AEC0271; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 02:36:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-02 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-03.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 24 Oct 2025 02:36:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pks.im; h=cc:cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm2; t=1761287796; x=1761374196; bh=kyGEXZzWUE 3GECEPvWCffX5NQurpj6BmEl0Y+ElkZFc=; b=bLYq2EGbPvmSg+A8o7vTUHdsRm B+qZHwX/WfWSQAm2RmKZKM0jGSL+++zLrut7tZjE5Wu6g3SWrxU2Z2CJD/G2tNet Y9OYVKjTmclYW5KXnRnxsoUyTxPtARDS/P0bw7KhC+HuttGuDLN84d2erulFCLfa fzfR4de88MSGP9EhD8z+OZzpPUosbirxkFqGWQ8GAmfnckwleDPWcVf4sCxXZ5Dw 2yvRwnt6vSPtptYu6MQH/6lpfyvt5TO5vEwYkutM7i+oBLm7TMBt5BmqKWQuRQmy mbZeQescUF1mNycZDd6xmox0NY5zjxRiYs+NoXd6dpIv7pI1r4glpGspVuRQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t= 1761287796; x=1761374196; bh=kyGEXZzWUE3GECEPvWCffX5NQurpj6BmEl0 Y+ElkZFc=; b=ycYYJ4+mpW8UBn6hXuPRX/XzRhdkpAWCNDFK/qCQw4Iq2mLu5b+ Gdbhb5F+XPxpNuNjoLRk+6NRpd3aTLPJ76b2oU9/Mr71SwJCai5WYIAUczDIBv20 I/WneHy1HPgb8QpCb9Y3je5dq3n3HPTRCL3mqiRFzcS0Y08YAcmDWsKmQbAPqbSx hAsLB0yiXgsPbxMuAxNWTqu2r3NGlE5ifJP70QbzpwJ3yZXE6ILArdxghEMimzc+ 4pzXSmHbfyRyaI/tYtgDl04GgiyXsPgmY+ESPBwh4gREcEBgowTsm5nnbhgacwhp OqrIATq5i7dFFwrkLy+b9QRdY5jjclOsopg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtdeggddugeekieegucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgrthhrihgt khcuufhtvghinhhhrghrughtuceophhssehpkhhsrdhimheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnh epveekkeffhfeitdeludeigfejtdetvdelvdduhefgueegudfghfeukefhjedvkedtnecu vehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhssehpkh hsrdhimhdpnhgspghrtghpthhtohepgedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthht ohepghhithhsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopegviigvkhhivghlnh gvfihrvghnsehgmhgrihhlrdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtohepshgrnhgurghlshestghruhhs thihthhoohhthhhprghsthgvrdhnvghtpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithesvhhgvghrrdhkvg hrnhgvlhdrohhrgh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i197146af:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 24 Oct 2025 02:36:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: by mail (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 6a68208a (TLSv1.3:TLS_CHACHA20_POLY1305_SHA256:256:NO); Fri, 24 Oct 2025 06:36:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2025 08:36:25 +0200 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "brian m. carlson" , Ezekiel Newren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ci: use Debian instead of deprecated i386/ubuntu Message-ID: References: <20251023-b4-pks-rust-cbindgen-v1-0-c19b61b03127@pks.im> <20251023-b4-pks-rust-cbindgen-v1-1-c19b61b03127@pks.im> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:56:01AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Patrick Steinhardt writes: > > > Ubuntu has ended support for 32 bit platforms and is not maintaining any > > release anymore that has 32 bit support. But we still use i386/ubuntu in > > our CI pipeline to test for compatibility with 32 bit systems, even > > though that specific image does not receive updates anymore. > > > > Besides being end-of-life, this image also doesn't have all packages > > available to it anymore. This creates problems with a subsequent patch, > > where we're about to pull in cbindgen for generating Rust to C bindings. > > > > Drop the Ubuntu image and use Debian instead, which continues to > > maintain its 32 bit port. > > Thanks, this is long overdue. > > Would this have nagative interactions with our recent tweak for > sudo-rust vs sudo-C, which I thought was only releavant for Ubuntu? > > I guess as long as i386/debian does not have /etc/alternatives/sudo > we should be safe, and we also handle debian-* (presumably 64-bit) > in the same case arm, so this should not be a new problem. Just > double checking. Yup, exactly. Debian continues to use the old sudo implementation, and it doesn't have /etc/alternatives/sudo at the current point in time. Patrick