From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] whitespace: correct bit assignment comments
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 07:39:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQBlCCDWMhLX_aBa@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqfrb4hyjl.fsf@gitster.g>
On Mon, Oct 27, 2025 at 01:36:46PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> diff --git a/diff.h b/diff.h
> index 2fa256c3ef..60749154e7 100644
> --- a/diff.h
> +++ b/diff.h
> @@ -331,9 +331,9 @@ struct diff_options {
>
> int ita_invisible_in_index;
> /* white-space error highlighting */
> -#define WSEH_NEW (1<<12)
> -#define WSEH_CONTEXT (1<<13)
> -#define WSEH_OLD (1<<14)
> +#define WSEH_NEW (1<<12)
> +#define WSEH_CONTEXT (1<<13)
> +#define WSEH_OLD (1<<14)
> unsigned ws_error_highlight;
> const char *prefix;
> int prefix_length;
Here you're using tabs for indentation, whereas below you use spaces. We
should probably be consistent.
> diff --git a/ws.h b/ws.h
> index 5ba676c559..611c6b6d50 100644
> --- a/ws.h
> +++ b/ws.h
> @@ -7,19 +7,19 @@ struct strbuf;
> /*
> * whitespace rules.
> * used by both diff and apply
> - * last two digits are tab width
> + * last two octal-digits are tab width (we support only up to 63).
> */
> -#define WS_BLANK_AT_EOL 0100
> -#define WS_SPACE_BEFORE_TAB 0200
> -#define WS_INDENT_WITH_NON_TAB 0400
> -#define WS_CR_AT_EOL 01000
> -#define WS_BLANK_AT_EOF 02000
> -#define WS_TAB_IN_INDENT 04000
> -#define WS_TRAILING_SPACE (WS_BLANK_AT_EOL|WS_BLANK_AT_EOF)
> +#define WS_BLANK_AT_EOL (1<<6)
> +#define WS_SPACE_BEFORE_TAB (1<<7)
> +#define WS_INDENT_WITH_NON_TAB (1<<8)
> +#define WS_CR_AT_EOL (1<<9)
> +#define WS_BLANK_AT_EOF (1<<10)
> +#define WS_TAB_IN_INDENT (1<<11)
> +#define WS_TRAILING_SPACE (WS_BLANK_AT_EOL|WS_BLANK_AT_EOF)
> #define WS_DEFAULT_RULE (WS_TRAILING_SPACE|WS_SPACE_BEFORE_TAB|8)
The "8" here is a bit curious, but this matches what the comment says:
the last two digits are the tab width, and there of course is no macro
for that.
> -#define WS_TAB_WIDTH_MASK 077
> +#define WS_TAB_WIDTH_MASK ((1<<6)-1)
> /* All WS_* -- when extended, adapt diff.c emit_symbol */
> -#define WS_RULE_MASK 07777
> +#define WS_RULE_MASK ((1<<12)-1)
> extern unsigned whitespace_rule_cfg;
> unsigned whitespace_rule(struct index_state *, const char *);
> unsigned parse_whitespace_rule(const char *);
All of these conversion look correct to me, and I agree that this is
easier to read.
Thanks!
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-28 6:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-27 20:36 [PATCH] whitespace: correct bit assignment comments Junio C Hamano
2025-10-28 6:39 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-10-28 13:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-10-28 16:33 ` [PATCH v2] " Junio C Hamano
2025-10-29 7:17 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-10-29 13:21 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQBlCCDWMhLX_aBa@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).