Re: [BUGS] Git v2.51.2 on NonStop5

["SZEDER Gábor" <szeder.dev@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Oct 30, 2025 at 05:46:01PM -0400, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
> On October 30, 2025 4:26 PM, Kristoffer Haugsbakk wrote:
> >On Thu, Oct 30, 2025, at 20:42, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> "Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 28, 2025, at 18:40, rsbecker@nexbridge.com wrote:
> >>>>[snip]
> >>>
> >>> Would it make sense for maintenance releases to have a small release
> >>> candidate pre-release?  Both of these maintenance releases have had
> >>> issues.
> >>
> >> Well, that is usually called "the tip of 'master'".  Has NonStop been
> >> having issues with the tip of 'master'?  For how long?  Why haven't we
> >> heard about it at all?  After things are merged there (which requires
> >> them to be cooking in 'next'---oh, has NonStop been having issues with
> >> 'next'?  For how long?), only fixes are chosen and merged to 'maint'
> >> to be the next maintenance release.
> >> ...
> >> I doubt any pre-release on 'maint' has much value in that anybody who
> >> are not testing the tip of 'master' would not be testing it either.
> >
> >You are probably 99.9% likely to be correct.
> 
> We tried setting up a CI/CD process for git on NonStop. The problem is that
> we use Jenkins, which gets triggered each time a change is made on a branch.
> The actual difficulty is that a single run takes more than a day. Once the
> committer adds each commit to a branch, we end up with a queue that is
> 2-3 weeks long, so end up not running a continuous process. Instead, we
> run about 1 a week, which should catch things. The difficulty is with the
> latest release is that 2.25.2 came out before our cycle and the breaks were
> in there because of changes to one test that just did not end up dequeuing
> in time. NonStop is building and testing fine now after Peff's suggestion on
> SHELL_PATH, but that was only apparent at 2.52.2. 2.51.1 did not have this
> issue with our inadvertent use of ksh to run each test script.

Neither the test library nor t7900 changed in the last two maintenance
releases:

  $ git rev-list --count v2.51.0..v2.51.2 -- t/test-lib.sh t/test-lib-functions.sh t/t7900-maintenance.sh
  0