From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, jltobler@gmail.com, gitster@pobox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] maintenance: add 'is-needed' subcommand
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 13:02:47 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aQyOZ0e6HO0_77Au@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251106-562-add-sub-command-to-check-if-maintenance-is-needed-v3-5-d611a2a95cf5@gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 09:22:34AM +0100, Karthik Nayak wrote:
> diff --git a/Documentation/git-maintenance.adoc b/Documentation/git-maintenance.adoc
> index 540b5cf68b..37939510d4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/git-maintenance.adoc
> +++ b/Documentation/git-maintenance.adoc
> @@ -84,6 +85,16 @@ The `unregister` subcommand will report an error if the current repository
> is not already registered. Use the `--force` option to return success even
> when the current repository is not registered.
>
> +is-needed::
> + Check whether maintenance needs to be run without actually running it.
> + Exits with a 0 status code if maintenance needs to be run, 1 otherwise.
> + Ideally used with the '--auto' flag.
> ++
> +If one or more `--task` options are specified, then those tasks are checked
I spoke too soon, forgot that there's one more patch :) s/\t/ /
> +in that order. Otherwise, the tasks are determined by which
> +`maintenance.<task>.enabled` config options are true. By default, only
> +`maintenance.gc.enabled` is true.
This could use a pointer to "maintenance.strategy", but I see that you
took this explanation from the "run" subcommand. I think this is good
enough for now.
> diff --git a/builtin/gc.c b/builtin/gc.c
> index c3e7a84ec2..e5ba2a2e72 100644
> --- a/builtin/gc.c
> +++ b/builtin/gc.c
> @@ -3253,7 +3253,59 @@ static int maintenance_stop(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
> return update_background_schedule(NULL, 0);
> }
>
> -static const char * const builtin_maintenance_usage[] = {
> +static const char *const builtin_maintenance_is_needed_usage[] = {
> + "git maintenance is-needed [--task=<task>] [--schedule]",
> + NULL
> +};
> +
> +static int maintenance_is_needed(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix,
> + struct repository *repo UNUSED)
> +{
> + struct maintenance_run_opts opts = MAINTENANCE_RUN_OPTS_INIT;
> + struct string_list selected_tasks = STRING_LIST_INIT_DUP;
> + struct gc_config cfg = GC_CONFIG_INIT;
> + struct option options[] = {
> + OPT_BOOL(0, "auto", &opts.auto_flag,
> + N_("run tasks based on the state of the repository")),
> + OPT_CALLBACK_F(0, "task", &selected_tasks, N_("task"),
> + N_("check a specific task"),
> + PARSE_OPT_NONEG, task_option_parse),
> + OPT_END()
> + };
> + bool is_needed = false;
> +
> + argc = parse_options(argc, argv, prefix, options,
> + builtin_maintenance_is_needed_usage,
> + PARSE_OPT_STOP_AT_NON_OPTION);
> + if (argc)
> + usage_with_options(builtin_maintenance_is_needed_usage, options);
> +
> + gc_config(&cfg);
> + initialize_task_config(&opts, &selected_tasks);
> +
> + if (opts.auto_flag) {
> + for (size_t i = 0; i < opts.tasks_nr; i++) {
> + if (tasks[opts.tasks[i]].auto_condition &&
> + tasks[opts.tasks[i]].auto_condition(&cfg)) {
> + is_needed = true;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> + } else {
> + /* When not using --auto, we should always require maintenance. */
Nit: we might add a TODO comment here.
/*
* When not using --auto we always require maintenance right now.
*
* TODO: this certainly is too eager, as some maintenance tasks may
* decide to not do anything because the data structures are already
* fully optimized. We may eventually want to extend the auto
* condition to also cover non-auto runs so that we can detect such
* cases.
/
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-06 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-31 14:22 [PATCH 0/5] maintenance: add an 'is-needed' subcommand Karthik Nayak
2025-10-31 14:22 ` [PATCH 1/5] reftable/stack: return stack segments directly Karthik Nayak
2025-10-31 16:22 ` Justin Tobler
2025-11-03 15:05 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-03 18:03 ` Justin Tobler
2025-10-31 14:22 ` [PATCH 2/5] reftable/stack: add function to check if optimization is required Karthik Nayak
2025-10-31 17:02 ` Justin Tobler
2025-10-31 18:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-03 16:20 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-03 15:51 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-03 17:59 ` Justin Tobler
2025-11-03 14:00 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-03 16:35 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-31 14:22 ` [PATCH 3/5] refs: add a `optimize_required` field to `struct ref_storage_be` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-31 14:22 ` [PATCH 4/5] maintenance: add checking logic in `pack_refs_condition()` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-03 14:00 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-03 17:04 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-10-31 14:22 ` [PATCH 5/5] maintenance: add 'is-needed' subcommand Karthik Nayak
2025-11-03 14:00 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-03 17:18 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 5:54 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-04 8:28 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] maintenance: add an " Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] reftable/stack: return stack segments directly Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] reftable/stack: add function to check if optimization is required Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 20:26 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-05 14:11 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-05 18:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-06 8:18 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] refs: add a `optimize_required` field to `struct ref_storage_be` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 8:43 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] maintenance: add checking logic in `pack_refs_condition()` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 8:44 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] maintenance: add 'is-needed' subcommand Karthik Nayak
2025-11-04 15:43 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] maintenance: add an " Junio C Hamano
2025-11-05 14:00 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 " Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] reftable/stack: return stack segments directly Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] reftable/stack: add function to check if optimization is required Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 18:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-07 6:06 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-06 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] refs: add a `optimize_required` field to `struct ref_storage_be` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] maintenance: add checking logic in `pack_refs_condition()` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 11:58 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-11-06 13:04 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 15:24 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-07 15:58 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-07 16:41 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-07 15:58 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 8:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] maintenance: add 'is-needed' subcommand Karthik Nayak
2025-11-06 12:02 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-11-06 13:07 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] maintenance: add an " Karthik Nayak
2025-11-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] reftable/stack: return stack segments directly Karthik Nayak
2025-11-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] reftable/stack: add function to check if optimization is required Karthik Nayak
2025-11-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] refs: add a `optimize_required` field to `struct ref_storage_be` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] maintenance: add checking logic in `pack_refs_condition()` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-08 21:51 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] maintenance: add 'is-needed' subcommand Karthik Nayak
2025-11-10 6:46 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] maintenance: add an " Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aQyOZ0e6HO0_77Au@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).