From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] last-modified: handle and document NUL termination
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 11:32:37 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aS1uxbvNE6rAQ1dl@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87tsye0z61.fsf@iotcl.com>
On Fri, Nov 28, 2025 at 07:50:30PM +0100, Toon Claes wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
> > Toon Claes <toon@iotcl.com> writes:
> >
> >> When option `-z` is provided to git-last-modified(1), each line is
> >> separated with a NUL instead of a newline. Document this properly and
> >> handle parsing of the option in the builtin itself.
> >
> > I think documenting does make sense, but it is not clear from the
> > description why it is better to handle the option in the builtin
> > itself, instead of letting the setup_revisions() take care of it.
>
> I know it's silly, but I wanted to feed these options to
> parse_options(). Doing this would make them show up in `git
> last-modified -h`.
I think that reasoning makes sense, but it's certainly non-obvious from
the commit message. So if you expand the commit message with an
explanation the change becomes much more sensible.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-01 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-26 6:09 [PATCH 0/3] Expand and enhance git-last-modified(1) documentation Toon Claes
2025-11-26 6:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] last-modified: handle and document NUL termination Toon Claes
2025-11-26 13:03 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-26 16:57 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-28 18:50 ` Toon Claes
2025-12-01 10:32 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2025-11-26 6:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] last-modified: document option --max-depth Toon Claes
2025-11-26 13:31 ` Karthik Nayak
2025-11-26 19:49 ` Junio C Hamano
2025-11-28 18:51 ` Toon Claes
2025-11-26 6:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] last-modified: better document how depth in handled Toon Claes
2025-11-26 17:38 ` Eric Sunshine
2025-12-01 10:32 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-02 11:01 ` Toon Claes
2025-12-02 17:14 ` Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aS1uxbvNE6rAQ1dl@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=toon@iotcl.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).