From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Harald Nordgren <haraldnordgren@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] remote: drop const return of tracking_for_push_dest()
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 07:34:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aW3QWxCNPy9paq9r@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260119052026.GB1991523@coredump.intra.peff.net>
On Mon, Jan 19, 2026 at 12:20:26AM -0500, Jeff King wrote:
> The string returned from tracking_for_push_dest() comes from
> apply_refspec(), and thus is always an allocated string (or NULL). We
> should return a non-const pointer so that the caller knows that
> ownership of the string is being transferred.
>
> This goes back to the function's origin in e291c75a95 (remote.c: add
> branch_get_push, 2015-05-21). It never really mattered because our
> return is just forwarded through branch_get_push_1(), which returns a
> const string as part of an intentionally hacky memory management scheme
> (see that commit for details).
Okay, so here we can now also return a `char *` now that `error_buf()`
got adapted.
> As the first step of untangling that hackery, let's drop the extra const
> from this helper function (and from the variables that store its
> result). There should be no functional change (yet).
Yup. The memory handling still feels weird, but as in the preceding
commit that's not a fault of this patch series.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-19 6:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-19 5:18 [PATCH 0/4] memory leaks in remote.c Jeff King
2026-01-19 5:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] remote: return non-const pointer from error_buf() Jeff King
2026-01-19 6:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-20 0:28 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-20 19:38 ` Jeff King
2026-01-20 20:18 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-19 5:20 ` [PATCH 2/4] remote: drop const return of tracking_for_push_dest() Jeff King
2026-01-19 6:34 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-01-19 5:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] remote: fix leak in branch_get_push_1() with invalid "simple" config Jeff King
2026-01-19 6:34 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-19 5:23 ` [PATCH 4/4] remote: always allocate branch.push_tracking_ref Jeff King
2026-01-19 6:34 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-19 15:04 ` Triangular workflow Harald Nordgren
2026-01-20 19:40 ` Jeff King
2026-01-20 0:31 ` [PATCH 0/4] memory leaks in remote.c Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aW3QWxCNPy9paq9r@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=haraldnordgren@gmail.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox