Re: [PATCH] help: report on whether or not gettext is enabled

[Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>]

On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 07:46:59AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > diff --git a/help.c b/help.c
> > index 20e114432d..96d70d8e6c 100644
> > --- a/help.c
> > +++ b/help.c
> > @@ -799,6 +799,11 @@ void get_version_info(struct strbuf *buf, int show_build_options)
> >  
> >  		if (fsmonitor_ipc__is_supported())
> >  			strbuf_addstr(buf, "feature: fsmonitor--daemon\n");
> > +#if defined NO_GETTEXT
> > +		strbuf_addstr(buf, "gettext: disabled\n");
> > +#else
> > +		strbuf_addstr(buf, "gettext: enabled\n");
> > +#endif
> 
> Presumably, we do not care too much about the version of this thing
> unlike ...
> 
> >  #if defined LIBCURL_VERSION
> >  		strbuf_addf(buf, "libcurl: %s\n", LIBCURL_VERSION);
> >  #endif
> 
> ... we do for the curl library, so only reporting "enabled" does
> feel perfectly OK to me.
> 
> I would prefer not to see the "disabled" entry myself, by the way.
> Combined with the vintage of Git binary that had these help text,
> the fact that an "enabled" line is missing is enough clue to
> diagnose.  I know you mimicked the Rust entry before this point
> (just above the precontext of the hunk), but I think we should fix
> it to drop the "disabled" entry from there.
> 
> Cc'ed the author of cb2badb4 (help: report on whether or not Rust is
> enabled, 2025-10-02).

One reason why I personally prefer to have enabled/disabled is that it
allows you to discern the following two cases:

  - You have a modern version of Git that doesn't have gettext.

  - You have an old version of Git that doesn't know to print
    information about whether or not gettext is enabled.

If we don't print the info at all when gettext is disabled then it's
impossible to tell these two cases apart. That argument in my mind also
extends to libcurl, where it would be more helpful to print "libcurl:
disabled" if it's not used.

I don't feel particularly strong about this though.

Patrick