public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: "René Scharfe" <l.s.r@web.de>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] tree: stop using the_repository
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2026 07:13:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aWXihQ3ETjQfO6dz@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <89e23323-7e0f-42b6-9a89-dd8a682644dd@web.de>

On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 08:37:03PM +0100, René Scharfe wrote:
> On 1/12/26 4:28 PM, Patrick Steinhardt wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 12, 2026 at 07:20:32AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im> writes:
> >>
> >>>>> In any case, I'd propose to move the compatibility macros into a section
> >>>>> that says something like:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>     /* Deprecated wrappers that will be removed once Git 2.53 is released. */
> >>>>
> >>>> Please do not take release schedule hostage to one particular fix-up
> >>>> series of patches.  Thanks.
> >>>
> >>> The intent isn't really to take anything hostage. It's rather intended
> >>> as a hint that once a specific event has happened, we should take
> >>> another look at removing these wrappers.
> >>
> >> I am OK with a comment that records the intent, e.g., "let's work
> >> towards reducing the use of these wrappers", with the plan for the
> >> next step, e.g., "and once we have done so, remove these."
> >>
> >> But the comment you wrote is forcing people to make sure we remove
> >> the code that uses these wrappers and unless we finish it we cannot
> >> release 2.53, no?
> > 
> > That's definitely not my intent. It's really only intended as a hint
> > when those should be removed at the earliest. Maybe something like the
> > following instead?
> > 
> >     /*
> >      * These wrappers can be removed once Git 2.53 is released. If you
> >      * see this comment and that release has been published then chances
> >      * are high that we forgot to remove them.
> >      */
> 
> Forgetting to remove the three macro definitions is very cheap.
> Forgetting to remove their Coccinelle rules is a bit more expensive.
> Can add a reminder.

True indeed. We have a bunch of Coccinelle rules that are not needed
anymore. We should probably do a spring cleanup of those.

Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2026-01-13  6:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-09 21:30 [PATCH 00/10] tree: stop using the_repository René Scharfe
2026-01-09 21:30 ` [PATCH 01/10] environment: move access to core.maxTreeDepth into repo settings René Scharfe
2026-01-12  9:21   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-12 19:37     ` René Scharfe
2026-01-09 21:30 ` [PATCH 02/10] tree: add repo_parse_tree*() René Scharfe
2026-01-09 21:30 ` [PATCH 03/10] add-interactive: use repo_parse_tree_indirect() René Scharfe
2026-01-09 21:30 ` [PATCH 04/10] bloom: use repo_parse_tree() René Scharfe
2026-01-09 21:30 ` [PATCH 05/10] delta-islands: " René Scharfe
2026-01-09 21:30 ` [PATCH 06/10] pack-bitmap-write: " René Scharfe
2026-01-09 21:30 ` [PATCH 07/10] path-walk: use repo_parse_tree_gently() René Scharfe
2026-01-09 21:30 ` [PATCH 08/10] tree: use repo_parse_tree() René Scharfe
2026-01-12  9:21   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-09 21:30 ` [PATCH 09/10] tree: stop using the_repository René Scharfe
2026-01-12  9:21   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-12 14:22     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-12 15:00       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-12 15:17         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-12 15:20         ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-12 15:28           ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-12 19:37             ` René Scharfe
2026-01-13  6:13               ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-01-09 21:30 ` [PATCH 10/10] cocci: convert parse_tree functions to repo_ variants René Scharfe
2026-01-15 22:01 ` [PATCH 11/10] cocci: remove obsolete the_repository rules René Scharfe
2026-01-16 10:02   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-16 17:28     ` Junio C Hamano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aWXihQ3ETjQfO6dz@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=l.s.r@web.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox