From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from complex.crustytoothpaste.net (complex.crustytoothpaste.net [172.105.7.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8718322B72 for ; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 23:10:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768518660; cv=none; b=urATS+L9T6LbwD2sRu054nUjp70AmLw0g2TcMx8eXzEPHR1Mls+s7JlIzMV+ScmrNUxBTPaMgdQCCFVMEqmQVe3RLWZtKTzUSch141fYm7Bdu5rN5jJrRRFpxg4eMAADLBLa6nh6fnlz5MtRB3c7QeNQIDMCF30QXF2hnx76xFg= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768518660; c=relaxed/simple; bh=rEF//U+tmgyCYZ29/YVgB2oozitxO4LD1ajZbiaN54M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=rwhAxwAvJyNQa+kJ2UvJvriVpdWj15B5P4AXYzVZa0csBb3tr7HLRGlc8p53NQb95zju1uxfrygVOE7rIv9DCu1kqB/RE61+jm1WJFCPuHLRRJ4QpxAJFsBgIqGTZGuF77WO23W1VL908H+Hk+/ngW4x3Afj8/9iy0DBvSOC20U= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b=Fe6BrDkE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=172.105.7.114 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=crustytoothpaste.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (3072-bit key) header.d=crustytoothpaste.net header.i=@crustytoothpaste.net header.b="Fe6BrDkE" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=crustytoothpaste.net; s=default; t=1768518652; bh=rEF//U+tmgyCYZ29/YVgB2oozitxO4LD1ajZbiaN54M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To:From:Reply-To:Subject:Date:To:CC: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:Content-Disposition; b=Fe6BrDkEIoT4LAJt60vr0gGCSbCKsAEl6e95oTOQP1Yo2SUFEWPJFDGk7aImLzqrK InmaCGG5k3WCTVO3SkVG22m1isQPYxjQhzbMla9wAWJiDaEN8SvifrXHngkmQs8ZKC qx4eOV1FMoFmqmbnBqJ9T7cDS2kN7Xq/HAfqaTlIVyt1SPxwI0qZUjTpzRAZMiVPoh AoxxgJ8THJ4b2s62TJWzZdWBwKBZ+qxqSegVVYPC254yl4JmZOCfOceDWgJWfZyLNG ptp8yiuOPyJlYPqTqA6vAn4Yo9LE1lE/8xQQ6tOAgPJ596Skq8eSJ4dgc9ch1T1gMx LJK8DVdoXugxWYLDQUtBOOrfDPYWTgONNfbWF90VGNjo40rEwH8yq2yRhnGJSCkLvq Y0yQ46byqEtPFS9PTWQPfjlMl42OKuAbEixjZyqfmBVv0+GdIEv5a7AVh2PMFYT6Ut yzGTMETG8nhObGMOkG75NW3kyamsEy4CeaVmGVn/TeYK8dIIj2F Received: from fruit.crustytoothpaste.net (unknown [IPv6:2607:f2c0:f00f:f901:d124:1890:72d:aada]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by complex.crustytoothpaste.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 50EA92006D; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 23:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 23:10:51 +0000 From: "brian m. carlson" To: Jeff King Cc: Patrick Steinhardt , Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood , Andreas Schwab , Ondrej Pohorelsky , Johannes Schindelin Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] sideband: add options to allow more control sequences to be passed through Message-ID: Mail-Followup-To: "brian m. carlson" , Jeff King , Patrick Steinhardt , Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org, Phillip Wood , Andreas Schwab , Ondrej Pohorelsky , Johannes Schindelin References: <20260115211448.GF1053259@coredump.intra.peff.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gem9hCRvZG83uKO8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260115211448.GF1053259@coredump.intra.peff.net> User-Agent: Mutt/2.2.13 (2024-03-09) --gem9hCRvZG83uKO8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2026-01-15 at 21:14:48, Jeff King wrote: > Is there any reason we cannot introduce the new functionality as a > config option but _not_ enable it by default? >=20 > That gives people the tools to protect themselves if they want to bear > the potential cost. It just feels a shame to deny them the tool because > we can't agree on the default. Yes, I think that would be a fine and reasonable approach. --=20 brian m. carlson (they/them) Toronto, Ontario, CA --gem9hCRvZG83uKO8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.4.8 (GNU/Linux) iHUEABYKAB0WIQQILOaKnbxl+4PRw5F8DEliiIeigQUCaWlz+wAKCRB8DEliiIei gYBUAQCrFAByTUsuTS4r6mMzLT1RgiGc5mGlZnkrIls4WYafGgEAxjh/KUO5loyq s+mIxICNVJHtTPDXEtCtxCKxcL9ExAY= =7wy6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gem9hCRvZG83uKO8--