From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: "Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org,
"Kristoffer Haugsbakk" <kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com>,
"Samo Pogačnik" <samo_pogacnik@t-2.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2026 14:38:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aYyGTmS6fEb2QfBU@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9b20ae06fd2c7f2c6b73c9f093a23c812227b7e.1768602661.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 10:31:01PM +0000, Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget wrote:
> diff --git a/shallow.c b/shallow.c
> index 497a25836b..1a32808865 100644
> --- a/shallow.c
> +++ b/shallow.c
> @@ -130,11 +130,12 @@ static void free_depth_in_slab(int **ptr)
> {
> FREE_AND_NULL(*ptr);
> }
> -struct commit_list *get_shallow_commits(struct object_array *heads, int depth,
> - int shallow_flag, int not_shallow_flag)
> +struct commit_list *get_shallow_commits(struct object_array *heads,
> + struct object_array *shallows, int *deepen_relative,
> + int depth, int shallow_flag, int not_shallow_flag)
> {
> - size_t i = 0;
> - int cur_depth = 0;
> + size_t i = 0, j;
We can declare `j` in the loop itself, as it's not used anywhere else.
> @@ -168,16 +169,30 @@ struct commit_list *get_shallow_commits(struct object_array *heads, int depth,
> }
> parse_commit_or_die(commit);
> cur_depth++;
> - if ((depth != INFINITE_DEPTH && cur_depth >= depth) ||
> - (is_repository_shallow(the_repository) && !commit->parents &&
> - (graft = lookup_commit_graft(the_repository, &commit->object.oid)) != NULL &&
> - graft->nr_parent < 0)) {
> - commit_list_insert(commit, &result);
> - commit->object.flags |= shallow_flag;
> - commit = NULL;
> - continue;
> + if (shallows) {
> + for (j = 0; j < shallows->nr; j++)
> + if (oideq(&commit->object.oid, &shallows->objects[j].item->oid))
> + if ((!cur_depth_shallow) || (cur_depth < cur_depth_shallow))
The additional braces around the respective conditions are not needed.
> + cur_depth_shallow = cur_depth;
> +
> + if ((is_repository_shallow(the_repository) && !commit->parents &&
> + (graft = lookup_commit_graft(the_repository, &commit->object.oid)) != NULL &&
> + graft->nr_parent < 0)) {
> + commit = NULL;
> + continue;
> + }
This block here is almost the same as the one below. But there's some
confusing parts:
- Why don't we update `result` at all?
- Why don't we set the `shallow_flag`?
- Why don't we have to check for the passed-in depth?
All of these parts feel somewhat surprising to me, as the function now
behaves so wildly different depending on whether or not `shallows` was
passed.
I guess this is because we really only care about `cur_depth_shallow`?
> diff --git a/upload-pack.c b/upload-pack.c
> index 2d2b70cbf2..4232eef34f 100644
> --- a/upload-pack.c
> +++ b/upload-pack.c
> @@ -704,54 +704,11 @@ error:
> return -1;
> }
>
> -static int get_reachable_list(struct upload_pack_data *data,
> - struct object_array *reachable)
> +static void get_shallows_depth(struct upload_pack_data *data)
I think this function is rather pointless, as there is only a single
caller and we only end up forwarding to `get_shallow_commits()`. Let's
inline it.
> @@ -881,29 +838,14 @@ static void deepen(struct upload_pack_data *data, int depth)
> struct object *object = data->shallows.objects[i].item;
> object->flags |= NOT_SHALLOW;
> }
> - } else if (data->deepen_relative) {
> - struct object_array reachable_shallows = OBJECT_ARRAY_INIT;
> - struct commit_list *result;
> -
> - /*
> - * Checking for reachable shallows requires that our refs be
> - * marked with OUR_REF.
> - */
> - refs_head_ref_namespaced(get_main_ref_store(the_repository),
> - check_ref, data);
> - for_each_namespaced_ref_1(check_ref, data);
> -
> - get_reachable_list(data, &reachable_shallows);
> - result = get_shallow_commits(&reachable_shallows,
> - depth + 1,
> - SHALLOW, NOT_SHALLOW);
> - send_shallow(data, result);
> - free_commit_list(result);
> - object_array_clear(&reachable_shallows);
> } else {
> struct commit_list *result;
>
> - result = get_shallow_commits(&data->want_obj, depth,
> + if (data->deepen_relative)
> + get_shallows_depth(data);
Okay, so here we now essentially call `get_shallow_commits()` twice. The
first time we compute `data->deepen_relative`, only to then pass it back
to `get_shallow_commits()` a second time. That feels quite strange to
me. Can't we have `get_shallow_commits()` handle this for us directly in
a single call?
> + result = get_shallow_commits(&data->want_obj, NULL, NULL,
> + data->deepen_relative + depth,
> SHALLOW, NOT_SHALLOW);
> send_shallow(data, result);
> free_commit_list(result);
Thanks!
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-11 13:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-09 18:11 [PATCH 0/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2025-12-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 1/2] shallow: free local object_array allocations Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-06 7:44 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-09 16:21 ` Samo Pogačnik
2026-01-09 16:33 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2025-12-09 18:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-06 7:44 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-01-09 16:48 ` Samo Pogačnik
2026-01-09 22:23 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-09 22:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] shallow: free local object_array allocations Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-09 22:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-10 4:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-01-10 5:13 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] " Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-10 5:13 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] shallow: free local object_array allocations Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-10 5:13 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-15 15:50 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-01-16 22:30 ` [PATCH v4 0/2] " Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-16 22:31 ` [PATCH v4 1/2] shallow: free local object_array allocations Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-01-16 22:31 ` [PATCH v4 2/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-02-11 13:38 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-02-13 20:48 ` Samo Pogačnik
2026-02-14 9:40 ` Samo Pogačnik
2026-02-15 11:19 ` Samo Pogačnik
2026-02-15 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-02-15 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] shallow: free local object_array allocations Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-02-15 20:11 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] shallow: handling fetch relative-deepen Samo Pogačnik via GitGitGadget
2026-02-20 22:34 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aYyGTmS6fEb2QfBU@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=kristofferhaugsbakk@fastmail.com \
--cc=samo_pogacnik@t-2.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox