From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a2-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.153]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7117C1534EC for ; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 06:34:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.153 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771828449; cv=none; b=OtDymQyv5U5qG9sQweeNDNG0h11H6nnOkI4njcCrhrSoJ346zUszJkIlfgUXu/uQI97Ug4/mDXI/uuDpnRLWZpqaJZSjg42uT1JqoC/r2mOCKnE1WIW4VJcP3PvHBCuXqbooe4+WYRPkyBaaQOdU0yI4WtJPPSFNGoQi86wVyz0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1771828449; c=relaxed/simple; bh=DJ8aJg3AiBSvHSIPEESdYiKc9UXqO7qF2s00YQpgaWM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=j/4cAVuMOcQ+qd4W8TYJAW/lpp4R/AvaCbr7MeVGhZi6tGuJl5TwaJU/yu6756WonSX/8XWrFdGiGDo086Hb5ANEeGprAyNX5VgR4tRoeC9Gm3YkG8oAygkAVTrdOYUU+RnUGK9hwfa4POMsxih4IvJ21D+1BTNd0nWSSSvTg+Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b=madKkb8X; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=GTewJxg0; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.153 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=pks.im Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=pks.im header.i=@pks.im header.b="madKkb8X"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="GTewJxg0" Received: from phl-compute-01.internal (phl-compute-01.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE8F1400012; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 01:34:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from phl-frontend-04 ([10.202.2.163]) by phl-compute-01.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 23 Feb 2026 01:34:06 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=pks.im; h=cc:cc :content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1771828446; x=1771914846; bh=O1bkFaM/6C wj62ciETbW4CVK01WghCuAScTKzw96NYs=; b=madKkb8XBBRMddyS/VK1x3sfIe x9ips0X+KcOqtVDGvmlbMfqZhNnqhxTOkAQ/DUSbGPGY43r965W+IWXyGqwJPpFe BPpBLddHtduV+2l7p5pGLK5+pQLytUhWXZ5iPvsZ9rVxi5fS/mIf0l9pndigA9kR 4y76XPQPljjlUuXMbAoRg51hag1pVhZTc9NVRFuH3+63vT4FNr87J/7vX9DMnzRs osaNYFUncztdeei+AKdNpi63nEiIm1AVD2U3GzzVTXyKBqnZu3nHq6gkuZcm6NDR FBxU8y91sEPODFAVwkmfQhJ4fb7XixXsN3okZ/hhC1I5JdgDt6vPMCRG/Y3A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1771828446; x=1771914846; bh=O1bkFaM/6Cwj62ciETbW4CVK01WghCuAScT Kzw96NYs=; b=GTewJxg0V7tcXzFoBrx1k0anuczQuVUyuLvUdGFPm5B/uNQgMRf /F8n4rtzbNrbjMzekSIWCG89ARJkdaTrG5GoZk5Nf2pNc8Bt8dtcq8yxCv1+EHw8 7dg6WTK6ELLmhZqL7BQeE5Q371XkwJgzul910/YhllDHZoLUgrGkAFNWV5+y8LfS L7/kcfanTDVDnh35LDIWFDYeljA3FMUCx2LyLV4yISid+9LZClGvWFZP37YwHqAT gw88Crggfo8GKz4j0i5JgWU1CabUWtUZO5A1L8HgTyjzp0wTPv9tIzP8c7NPWgFC MbUPUXDY76o4QbO6zMnkOJMsSuzfU9epd/g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeefgedrtddtgddvfeeihedtucetufdoteggodetrf dotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceu rghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujf gurhepfffhvfevuffkfhggtggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomheprfgrthhrihgt khcuufhtvghinhhhrghrughtuceophhssehpkhhsrdhimheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnh epveevfefhhfehtdekheelfedtfeevveejjeelvdekfeffffehvdejhfdvleevffdvnecu ffhomhgrihhnpehgihhthhhusgdrtghomhdpuhgsuhhnthhurdgtohhmnecuvehluhhsth gvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepphhssehpkhhsrdhimhdp nhgspghrtghpthhtohephedpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepghhith hsthgvrhesphhosghogidrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehgihhtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrhhn vghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtohepghhithhhuhgssehprghulhhishgrghgvvghkrdgtoh hmpdhrtghpthhtohepphgruhhlsehprghulhhtrghrjhgrnhdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthho pehgihhtghhithhgrggughgvthesghhmrghilhdrtghomh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i197146af:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 23 Feb 2026 01:34:05 -0500 (EST) Received: by mail (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 827c4677 (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Mon, 23 Feb 2026 06:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2026 07:34:00 +0100 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: Junio C Hamano Cc: Paul Tarjan , Paul Tarjan , Paul Tarjan via GitGitGadget , git@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] fsmonitor: implement filesystem change listener for Linux Message-ID: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Sat, Feb 21, 2026 at 09:07:52AM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Paul Tarjan writes: > > >> I just noticed that the discussion thread went silent after this > >> message. Has the patch been reviewed and tested well to proceed, > >> except for that meson-build support? > > > > I'd love to see it integrated upstream. Is there anything else you > > need from me? > > > >> > This would also need the below patch to support Meson. Would be great if > >> > you include it, otherwise I can send it as a separate patch once this > >> > topic lands. Thanks! > > > > I'd prefer to take you up on the offer to send the meson support as a > > separate patch. > > This part of your message is one thing we needed from you to unblock > ourselves, I guess. > > Patrick, do you think you can help making this into two-patch > series, the original one being the [PATCH 1/2] and update for > meson-build in [PATCH 2/2]? The changes I sent should be sufficient, so I'd propose to just roll it into the v5 patch. > > I'm unfamiliar with that system and the suggested > > patch failed in CI on some dependency installation steps which felt > > unrelated but I didn't want to debug. > > https://github.com/git/git/actions/runs/20720903513 > > The topic has been in my tree near the tip of 'seen' and I do not > think we saw CI failures coming from this topic. Yeah, I think this was simply a flaky CI job. The "linux-reftable" job has failed installing packages: Err:3 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu questing-security/universe amd64 Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 91.189.91.83 80] File has unexpected size (89328 != 89310). Mirror sync in progress? [IP: 91.189.91.83 80] Hashes of expected file: - Filesize:89310 [weak] - SHA256:16943889a9abc4aaeb0e701e99db0004ac0241de728183f7a2923bb7927b107b - SHA1:fac9e79fb36b57de3770e639c4b5bf9231342f15 [weak] - MD5Sum:8cf081c59fbb279da27867d94f2b9520 [weak] Release file created at: Mon, 05 Jan 2026 13:30:45 +0000 And all the other jobs simply got aborted because of that initial failure. In any case, the changes work alright with Meson on my system. By the way, I haven't yet done a full review of this patch, I only chimed in to help out with Meson. But I can have a deeper look once v5 was sent out. Thanks! Patrick