From: Lorenzo Pegorari <lorenzo.pegorari2002@gmail.com>
To: git@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christian Couder <christian.couder@gmail.com>,
Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@gmail.com>,
Justin Tobler <jltobler@gmail.com>,
Siddharth Asthana <siddharthasthana31@gmail.com>,
Ayush Chandekar <ayu.chandekar@gmail.com>,
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Subject: [GSoC] extensions.partialClone and promisor remote fetch order
Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2026 10:28:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aavvwfZllMWUwIl3@lorenzo-VM> (raw)
Hi everyone. In the past weeks I deeply studied the documentation
regarding the GSoC'26 idea "Implement promisor remote fetch ordering". I
am preparing a proposal that is as detailed as possible, and that tries
to answer to as many questions as possible. I am also experimenting a
lot with multiple promisor remotes configurations, and creating some
examples that I will showcase in my proposal.
I have a question regarding the interaction between the config
"extensions.partialClone" and a possible fetch ordering mechanism:
* from my understanding, and from my personal tests, it looks like
"extensions.partialClone" is not essential when working with multiple
promisor remotes. Having these promisor remotes setted up with
"remote.<name>.promisor" and "remote.<name>.partialCloneFilter" seems
sufficient. In this case, the promisor remotes will be tried one
after the other, in the order in which they appear in the config.
* if "extensions.partialClone" is present, then the promisor remote
configured using the "extensions.partialClone" config var will be the
last one tried when fetching an object.
1. is what I explained correct?
2. when the fetch ordering mechanism will be added, this config var will
not be useful anymore. How should it be handled? It probably can't
just be removed, so the fetch ordering mechanism should be flexible
enough to handle a situation where "extensions.partialClone" is
present, correct?
Thanks,
Lorenzo
next reply other threads:[~2026-03-07 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-07 9:28 Lorenzo Pegorari [this message]
2026-03-07 14:58 ` [GSoC] extensions.partialClone and promisor remote fetch order Lorenzo Pegorari
2026-03-09 13:40 ` Christian Couder
2026-03-10 18:32 ` Lorenzo Pegorari
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aavvwfZllMWUwIl3@lorenzo-VM \
--to=lorenzo.pegorari2002@gmail.com \
--cc=ayu.chandekar@gmail.com \
--cc=christian.couder@gmail.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=jltobler@gmail.com \
--cc=karthik.188@gmail.com \
--cc=siddharthasthana31@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox