Re: [RFC PATCH v2] revision: new rev^-n shorthand for rev^n..rev

["Jakub Narębski" <jnareb@gmail.com>]

W dniu 25.09.2016 o 10:55, Vegard Nossum pisze:
> I use rev^..rev daily, and I'm surely not the only one. To save typing
> (or copy-pasting, if the rev is long -- like a full SHA-1 or branch name)
> we can make rev^- a shorthand for that.
> 
> The existing syntax rev^! seems like it should do the same, but it
> doesn't really do the right thing for merge commits (it gives only the
> merge itself).
> 
> As a natural generalisation, we also accept rev^-n where n excludes the
> nth parent of rev, although this is expected to be generally less useful.
> 
> [v2: Use ^- instead of % as suggested by Junio Hamano and use some
>  common helper functions for parsing.]

Minor sidenote: the above should go after the "---" line, as it should
be not included in the final commit message.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
> ---
>  Documentation/revisions.txt | 14 +++++++
>  builtin/rev-parse.c         | 28 ++++++++++++++
>  revision.c                  | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  revision.h                  |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 134 insertions(+)