From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Cc: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>,
Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 10:54:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <abvH8ttRkgu1R57C@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5122920d-078e-46c6-a494-c6e430df7e3f@gmail.com>
On Wed, Mar 18, 2026 at 09:15:00AM -0400, Derrick Stolee wrote:
> On 3/17/2026 6:10 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> >> Update the path-walk API to accept certain kinds of pathspecs and to
> >> silently ignore anything too complex.
> >
> > Hmph, "silently ignore", instead of "no, you cannot use that! and
> > die", or at least "sorry, I cannot do that, so the result may not be
> > what you wanted, you've been warned"?
>
> The behavior when silently ignoring is to over-download. The revision
> walk still filters commits, but the path-walk then walks paths beyond
> that pathspec. This will be fixed in the next commit, so adding an
> error case didn't seem worth it. I'll do a better job foreshadowing.
I guess this is a fine tradeoff when documented properly. But I think in
that case we should make very clear that this behaviour may change in
the future if find a way to efficiently limit the pathwalk, too.
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-03-19 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-03-17 0:29 [PATCH 0/5] backfill: accept revision arguments Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-17 0:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] revision: include object-name.h Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-17 21:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-17 0:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-17 0:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] backfill: accept revision arguments Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-17 22:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-18 15:37 ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-03-23 0:31 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-19 9:54 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-23 0:35 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-17 0:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-17 22:10 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-18 13:15 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-19 9:54 ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-03-19 9:55 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-19 10:15 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-23 0:47 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-17 0:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-17 22:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-18 13:16 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-23 1:33 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-17 21:45 ` [PATCH 0/5] backfill: accept revision arguments Junio C Hamano
2026-03-19 9:54 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-19 12:59 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-20 7:35 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-23 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-23 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] revision: include object-name.h Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-23 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-23 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] backfill: accept revision arguments Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-24 7:59 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-26 12:55 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-23 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-24 7:59 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-26 12:58 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-23 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-23 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-23 15:29 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-23 20:39 ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-26 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] backfill: accept revision arguments Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-26 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] revision: include object-name.h Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-26 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-26 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] backfill: accept revision arguments Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-26 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-26 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-26 15:14 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-27 7:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/6] backfill: accept revision arguments Patrick Steinhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=abvH8ttRkgu1R57C@pks.im \
--to=ps@pks.im \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=stolee@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox