public inbox for git@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick Steinhardt <ps@pks.im>
To: Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget <gitgitgadget@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, gitster@pobox.com,
	Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2026 10:55:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <abvIADZ8kt11t2kP@pks.im> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <977f62faa550ecc4ef7774b4ecf53a9a520fc62a.1773707361.git.gitgitgadget@gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 17, 2026 at 12:29:20AM +0000, Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget wrote:
> diff --git a/path-walk.c b/path-walk.c
> index 364e4cfa19..e1ad4b0208 100644
> --- a/path-walk.c
> +++ b/path-walk.c
> @@ -481,6 +524,18 @@ int walk_objects_by_path(struct path_walk_info *info)
>  	if (info->tags)
>  		info->revs->tag_objects = 1;
>  
> +	if (ctx.revs->prune_data.nr) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Only exact prefix pathspecs are currently supported.
> +		 * Clear any wildcard or magic pathspecs to avoid
> +		 * incorrect prefix matching.
> +		 */
> +		struct pathspec *pd = &ctx.revs->prune_data;
> +
> +		if (pd->has_wildcard || pd->magic)
> +			pd->nr = 0;
> +	}

Huh, curious. Won't this cause a leak? I guess we should rather use
`clear_pathspec()` here.

Also shows that this path is missing test coverage.

Patrick

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-03-19  9:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-03-17  0:29 [PATCH 0/5] backfill: accept revision arguments Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-17  0:29 ` [PATCH 1/5] revision: include object-name.h Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-17 21:52   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-17  0:29 ` [PATCH 2/5] t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-17  0:29 ` [PATCH 3/5] backfill: accept revision arguments Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-17 22:01   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-18 15:37   ` Kristoffer Haugsbakk
2026-03-23  0:31     ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-19  9:54   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-23  0:35     ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-17  0:29 ` [PATCH 4/5] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-17 22:10   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-18 13:15     ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-19  9:54       ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-19  9:55   ` Patrick Steinhardt [this message]
2026-03-19 10:15   ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-23  0:47     ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-17  0:29 ` [PATCH 5/5] path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-17 22:19   ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-18 13:16     ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-23  1:33       ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-17 21:45 ` [PATCH 0/5] backfill: accept revision arguments Junio C Hamano
2026-03-19  9:54 ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-19 12:59   ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-20  7:35     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-23 11:40 ` [PATCH v2 0/6] " Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-23 11:40   ` [PATCH v2 1/6] revision: include object-name.h Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-23 11:40   ` [PATCH v2 2/6] t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-23 11:40   ` [PATCH v2 3/6] backfill: accept revision arguments Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-24  7:59     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-26 12:55       ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-23 11:40   ` [PATCH v2 4/6] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-24  7:59     ` Patrick Steinhardt
2026-03-26 12:58       ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-23 11:40   ` [PATCH v2 5/6] path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-23 11:40   ` [PATCH v2 6/6] t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-23 15:29     ` Junio C Hamano
2026-03-23 20:39       ` Derrick Stolee
2026-03-26 15:14   ` [PATCH v3 0/6] backfill: accept revision arguments Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-26 15:14     ` [PATCH v3 1/6] revision: include object-name.h Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-26 15:14     ` [PATCH v3 2/6] t5620: prepare branched repo for revision tests Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-26 15:14     ` [PATCH v3 3/6] backfill: accept revision arguments Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-26 15:14     ` [PATCH v3 4/6] backfill: work with prefix pathspecs Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-26 15:14     ` [PATCH v3 5/6] path-walk: support wildcard pathspecs for blob filtering Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-26 15:14     ` [PATCH v3 6/6] t5620: test backfill's unknown argument handling Derrick Stolee via GitGitGadget
2026-03-27  7:07     ` [PATCH v3 0/6] backfill: accept revision arguments Patrick Steinhardt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=abvIADZ8kt11t2kP@pks.im \
    --to=ps@pks.im \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitgitgadget@gmail.com \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=stolee@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox